Updated: December 2, 2018
Choosing the right hosting service is a nerve-wracking experience because hosting can make or break your website. You have to spend hours upon hours doing research, trying to understand what sounds like gibberish and then comparing all these companies.
I’ve done all the legwork for you and you’ll find a comprehensive SiteGround vs Bluehost hosting comparison below, along with many other hosting reviews and comparisons, including HostGator vs Bluehost and HostGator vs SiteGround.
Bluehost was founded in 2003, whereas SiteGround made its entry into hosting in 2004.
If you are too busy to read this entire review, here's an infographic that covers the main points.
SiteGround Vs Bluehost tests
- SiteGround Vs Bluehost – Popularity Test
- Bluehost Vs SiteGround – Security Test
- Bluehost Vs SiteGround – Uptime Test
- SiteGround vs Bluehost Server Response Time
- Bluehost vs SiteGround – Website Speed Test
- Bluehost vs SiteGround – WordPress and Cloud
- SiteGround Vs Bluehost: Customer Support
Who hosting is more popular?
Here’s a graph which describes the popularity of SiteGround and Bluehost over the years.
As you can see from the graph, Bluehost was growing rapidly until 2013, when they were finally acquired by EIG. After the acquisition, like any other EIG company, Bluehost started receiving so many bad reviews, finally resulting in a low popularity and less growth. They grew only 10% in the last 3 years, compared to 100% growth from SiteGround.
SiteGround was hosting only 500,000 websites by 2015, now they host over 1.8 million websites, that’s a 3* increase in the last 3 years.
Web hosting companies associated with EIG has a very bad reputation for support and reliability as you can see from the below image.
Bluehost vs SiteGround – Performance, Reliability, Speed test and Security
SiteGround web hosting developed some highly innovative approaches and ideas such as their own SuperCacher, latest PHP releases and SSD Drives(Bluehost recently started using SSD drives).
SSD drives are more expensive but have proven to be faster and more reliable than HDD drives. SiteGround and Bluehost uses Apache + NGINX web server technology, running NGINX for static files and Apache for dynamic ones. This is a popular formula used by top web hosting companies. They use NGINX reverse proxy caching solution in front of Apache to give your visitors a fast website.
SiteGround has already released PHP 7.3 RC. The latest PHP version is 2 x faster and requires less server resource to deliver your website to the same number of visitors. Conversely, Bluehost has not yet provided their customers with access to PHP 7.2 and are still running PHP 7.0. And support for
#PHP 5.6 and PHP 7 will end after December.
Over the last 2 years, most sites are moving rapidly towards HTTPS due to free certificate By Lets Encrypt and Google openly promoting HTTPS site.
However, one main issue with people moving towards HTTPS site has been the slight increase in load time as a result. This was addressed by SiteGround using the latest TCP 1.3 and OCSP stapling method.
Bluehost is much slower across the board in terms of updates and new features, which sets them pretty far behind SiteGround on the cutting-edge technology front.
The most recent survey Sitground conducted among its customers shows a satisfaction score of 97% in 2017.
This score has steadily increased over the past three years, proving that SiteGround constantly strives to improve the quality of the services they offer.
1. SiteGround vs Bluehost Security – SiteGround is safer against multiple web threats and malware.
SiteGround has recently developed an anti-bot AI that protects their customers from brute-force attacks.
The new bot prevention system has delivered amazing results as it blocks as many as 2 million attacks across their servers. Not only does the AI system protect customer websites, but it also frees up server resources that can now be used by customers.
The AI system monitors all SiteGround’s servers simultaneously and analyzes the data. Based on the results, it takes automatic action to stop malicious bots. Some of the flags the AI watches include:
- Failed Logins
- How many simultaneous connects are present to different URLs
- DDoS weaknesses that are already known in different apps
- Various request types associated DDoS attacks
- A constantly updating list of blacklisted user agents
When the AI determines that an IP is malicious, it blocks it and issues a challenge via a Captcha page. If the “puzzle” is solved, meaning that it’s actually a human and not a malicious bot, the address is whitelisted. And the AI learns from these situations so that it can reduce the level of false positives that occur.
Thus, SiteGround’s new security system is much more efficient at protecting customer websites.
Bluehost relies on Cloudflare to protect its customers from DDoS attacks. They also offer other security features, such as spam protection, password-protected directories, and an option to blacklist certain IPs.★ Winner
SiteGround wins by a long-shot because they’ve developed their own AI to thwart brute-force attacks and aren’t relying on a third party to protect their customers.
2. Bluehost Vs SiteGround Uptime Test – Which Hosting Offers Better Uptime?
Uptime is the amount of time your website is up and running to your visitors. There are many chances that your website might be not available to your visitors as a result of hardware failure, server maintenance, power shutdown, etc., by your web hosting company. That’s why this test is very important as less uptime can bring a lot of loss to your business through loss of credibility, lost sales, Google rank loss, etc,.
Both Bluehost and SiteGround promises 99.99% uptime guarantees. However, practice shows that Bluehost has significant and consistent issues with downtime, leading to an average uptime of less than 98% per month.
SiteGround, on the other hand, does not exhibit any major problems with downtime. In fact, over the past year, their average uptime exceeded 99.99%. This proves that their servers are highly reliable and some of the best in the industry.
We used Host Tracker to monitor approximately 150 Bluehost and SiteGround websites to determine a more accurate figure for their uptime.
To see different estimates for uptime percentage, you can change the date variables for the following interactive graph using this Live hosting uptime tracking tool from Inlinehostblogger. Continue reading