SiteGround Vs Bluehost: 9 Test to Decide "Who’s Best" in 2021?

SiteGround and Bluehost are two of the most popular web hosting in 2020. In this article, we will tackle the "SiteGround Vs Bluehost" with performance oriented comparison which will primarily compare speed, reliability and customer satisfaction among various other components between these two companies.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost

Updated: April 15, 2021

Choosing the right hosting service is a nerve-wracking experience because hosting can make or break your website. You have to spend hours upon hours doing research, trying to understand what sounds like gibberish. Then, you have to compare all these companies to find the right one for your needs.

The good news is that in this SiteGround vs Bluehost comparison, we’ll demystify the jargon and reveal what’s important. Of course, we’ll also determine which of these two brands is the best at what they do.

SiteGround and Bluehost are a great choice for small and large blogs alike. They are both leaders in their categories, but they are also extremely popular, with around 2 million customers each.

These aren’t the only comparisons and reviews we’ve done, though. You can check out many other hosting reviews and comparisons in this blog, including HostGator vs Bluehost and SiteGround Vs HostGator.

About our SiteGround Vs Bluehost comparison: We tested SiteGround and Bluehost by purchasing their base hosting plans on their servers in Chicago and Provo respectively. We installed WordPress 5.2.3 and used a complex theme with demo content from Mojo marketplace. Both hosting services were primarily tested from Los Angeles, USA.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost Winner – Why SiteGround is better than Bluehost?





Overall Score





Best For

Newbie users and also more experienced users, who are unhappy with their current hosting provider and are looking for a stable, secure, and feature-rich service at a reasonable price.


Not recommended.

Server Location

USA, UK, Netherlands, Germany, Singapore, AustraliaUSA


They are one of the leading web hosting companies in the industry. Provides an innovative approach to speed and security, constant service improvements through latest technologies combined with friendly and expert support.A well-known web hosting that offers web hosting for an average price targetted to users with limited performance requirement.
Visit site
Read review
Visit site
Read review

If you don’t have the patience to read through our comprehensive review (or simply don’t require that many details).

SiteGround is a better choice for hosting Shared, WordPress, or Cloud websites compared to Bluehost. While Bluehost offered slightly better rates, SiteGround’s performance(speed), reliability(uptime), and support is far better than anything Bluehost has to offer.
 Every year they always strive to be the first who provide the latest technologies such as the latest PHP version, Quic technology, HTTP/2, TLS 1.3, OCSP Stapling to speed up performance.
  • Here’s an interactive infographic that covers the main point.

    -Average initial price

    -Starts at $5.95/mo for a basic account


    -Average Initial price

    -Starts at $6.99/mo for a basic account

    -Hosts over 2 million websites

    -Popularity Declining


    -Hosts over 2 million websites

    Highly Popular


    -99.97% Uptime recorded


    -Highly Reliable

    -100% Uptime recorded

    -Average speed


    -Very fast

    -Uses same data center as used by, and

    -Officially recommended by wordpress

    -Cloud and WordPress packages are just an extension of their shared hosting.


    -Officially recommended by wordpress

    Highly optimized Cloud and WordPress packages

    -Uses cPanel


    -Custom control panel
    -Medium level security

    -Uses 3rd party security tools


    -Highly Secure

    -The best security in the industry.

    -Average Support

    -Long waiting time and poor support



    -Won stevie Award for Best Customer Support for the year 2020

    -Good for beginners


    -Excellent for beginners

    -Free transfer, setup wizard, and many beginner-friendly features.

    – 1.5/5(Rated 1.5 out of 5)

    – 600 reviews


    – 4.7/5(Rated 4.7 out of 5)

    – 6000 reviews

    – Bluehost = 2/10


    – SiteGround = 10/10


Why choose SiteGround over Bluehost?

SiteGround’s performance is 3-5x better than Bluehost…

Speed and availability(uptime) is the biggest factor differentiating a very good host from an average web host.

Therefore, we carried out several tests to check the speed and reliability of both SiteGround and Bluehost.

Here’s a test conducted using the Sematext website performance monitoring tool on a test website with an identical webpage hosted on SiteGround and Bluehost.

We actually pay and maintain web hosting that we test here.  So, here’s the test website hosted on these web hosting. Both these web pages have the same theme and content installed.

Test website hosted  on SiteGround:

Test website hosted on Bluehost:


As seen from the above image, SiteGround’s average load time was around 0.5S, which is exceptionally fast for any web hosting. In fact, it’s the fastest we have tested here.

Their performance in the USA was far greater than in Europe and Australia, this is due to the fact that this website was hosted on SiteGround’s USA servers. That being said, they loaded under a second even from Europe and Australia. This is an excellent benchmark for any web hosting.

When it comes to uptime(availability), it was up 100% of the time with no downtime.

For Bluehost, they loaded  5-6 times slower than SiteGround for the same exact website as seen from the below result.

Bluehost Overall performance metrics
– Bluehost

Moreover, their availability was not that great with multiple downtimes during our testing period as seen below.

Bluehost downtimes
– Bluehost downtimes.

You can use to check the speed of the above web pages for yourself.

Also, to help you choose better, we also did several comprehensive comparisons between SiteGround and Bluehost with multiple tests on different aspects of their web hosting.

Below, you can see exactly how we reached our conclusions.

Breakdown of this comparison

  1. Speed test
  2. Popularity
  3. Pricing
  4. Sever Quality
  5. Uptime
  6. Security
  7. WordPress and Cloud
  8. Support
  9. UA Interface

Also Read: SiteGround Review – Why we rated SiteGround #1 web host in 2020?

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

1. Bluehost Vs SiteGround Speed Test – SiteGround is super fast.

SiteGround SpeedBluehost Speed
Load time: 0.75sLoad time: 1.25s
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★
Rank: #1 in SpeedRank: #4 in Speed

Let’s be honest. In today’s high-speed era, no one is going to hang around even for a few seconds more than they’re used to for a website to load. You could have the best content in the world, but unless you’re offering something very valuable (like diamonds) for free, no one is going to stick around.

Check out how you can decrease your website speed by 1- 2 seconds using SiteGround, WP Rocket, and Asset CleanUP PRO plugin.

With this in mind, we hosted 2 identical websites on Bluehost and SiteGround to understand their website speed.

This is the most accurate way to figure out the speed of a hosting company’s servers as both firms are served with exactly the same webpage from the same location. The small difference in page size is due to server-level catching because these hosts use different types of servers.

SiteGround speed test
– SiteGround
Bluehost speed test
– Bluehost

In this test, SiteGround loaded 2xfaster than Bluehost.

After SiteGround’s recent shift to Google Cloud data centers and their implementation of Ultra-Fast PHP, their websites are roughly 40% faster than before due to the high-quality servers provided by Google.

The ultrafast PHP has proven to add 30% more performance to a site. This is one of the most effective speed improvements that they have introduced recently and it adds great value to your website speed.

Which hosting is Faster around the world?

Even though SiteGround had a better load time from the USA, we wanted to know how SiteGround and Bluehost performed for the rest of the world. Therefore, we ran another test where we used the same website and checked the speed from multiple locations around the world.

LocationSiteGround Load timeBluehost Load time
N. California, USA0.4s2.2S
N. Virginia, USA0.35S2.1S
Sao Paulo0.9S4.3S

The outcome of this test –

  • SiteGround managed to load 2x faster than Bluehost everywhere around the world, with U.S. load time being the fastest.
  • It’s clear from the above 2 tests that Bluehost has average speed in the USA, but their overall worldwide speed is below average.

According to Google’s latest research, 53% of people will leave a page if it takes longer than 3 seconds to load. That said, the SiteGround website loaded in less than 1 seconds for 8 out of 8 locations in the above test. 

Based on these figures, it’s clear that SiteGround is the winner in terms of speed. They have great servers but the fact that they use Google Cloud service which has 24 servers around the world also helps. The physical distance the data has to travel also affects overall load time.

Another technology, which SiteGround recently deployed, that boosts the speed of the sites we host out of the box is the Brotli compression algorithm. This is a next-generation technology developed by Google as a successor to the popular gzip.

SiteGround’s Google servers are located in Chicago, London, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Sydney, and Singapore.

On the other hand, Bluehost doesn’t reveal the location of all their data centers, though some believe they have one in Mumbai, another in Shanghai, and, of course, their US locations in Provo and Orem, Utah.

More on SiteGround’s data center can be read here.

As you can see below, SiteGround’s performance is on par with high premium hostings like Kinsta and WP Engine. Those hosts, however, will set you back an additional $10-20/month compared to SiteGround.

SiteGround better than Bluehost , kinsta, wpengine.png

#SiteGround lets you change the server location of your website

One of the most effective ways to speed up your website is to place your website’s files on a server that is located near your target audience.

For example, if you have most of your traffic coming from Chicago, try to work with a host who has their servers in Chicago. This is highly recommended unless you can afford to set up a CDN for your website.

As a matter of fact, SiteGround offers CDN included for free with all their plans.

Also Read: Max CDN(Stackpath) vs Cloudflare – Which Is The Fastest CDN in 2019?

SiteGround vs Bluehost server location
If you’re hosting your website with SiteGround, you can change server location with just 2-3 clicks from the account panel.

SiteGround makes it very easy to change server location anytime you want. So, don’t worry if you don’t know where most of your target audience is located when you start out.

However, changing the server location with SiteGround is a paid service, as it requires a website migration service in reality.

In contrast, Bluehost doesn’t let us choose a server location even during the initial process.

We have seen so many people switching from Bluehost to SiteGround due to their excellent speed and support.

SiteGround and Bluehost's speed review

Also Read:

How to Improve the Loading Speed of Your Website: A Step-by-Step Guide

★ Winner SiteGround. SiteGround is easily 2x faster than Bluehost in all our tests.

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

2. Popularity – SiteGround grew its customer base four-fold in the last 5 years.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost popularity

SiteGround hosted only 500,000 websites in 2015, but they host over 2.6 million websites in 2021, a five-fold increase in size over the last 6 years.

On the other hand, Bluehost recorded no growth in the last few years.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost popularity Google trends
Interest over time on SiteGround and Bluehost.

As you can see from the above Google Trends graph, Bluehost is still popular than SiteGround due to their relatively low price compared to SiteGround. However, SiteGround is narrowing that gap with their excellent performance in the last few years as you can see from the graph.

As a matter of fact, popularity and performance doesn’t always go hand in hand as it’s proven time and again that the most popular companies are not the best performing companies in their niche.

Bluehost is owned by EIG…

Bluehost was growing rapidly until 2013 when they were acquired by EIG. After the acquisition, like any other EIG company, Bluehost started receiving so many bad reviews that it eventually led to a significant drop in popularity and growth.

– Twitter reactions towards EIG companies.

Why Bluehost is not a good choice

★ Winner SiteGround. 

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

3. Bluehost Vs SiteGround 2019 Pricing – Bluehost is cheaper in the long run

Plan NameSiteGround StartUPGrowBigGoGeekBluehost BasicPlusChoice Plus
Visitors Allowed/mo10,00025,000100,000UnmeteredUnmeteredUnmetered
Disk Space10 GB20 GB40 GB50GBUnmeteredUnmetered
Number of Websites Allowed1UnlimitedUnlimited1UnlimitedUnlimited
Data TransferUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Sub DomainsUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited25UnlimitedUnlimited
Parked DomainsUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited5UnlimitedUnlimited
Free Domain NameNoNoNoYesYesYes
30-Day Money-Back GuaranteeYesYesYesYesYesYes
Email AccountsUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited5UnlimitedUnlimited
Server LocationLondon, Chicago and SingaporeLondon, Chicago and SingaporeLondon, Chicago and SingaporeNot DisclosedNot DisclosedNot Disclosed
Free CDNYesYesYesYesYesYes
Free Site BackupEverydayEverydayEverydayNoNoEveryday
Backup On DemandNoYesYesNoNoNo
Operating SystemLinuxLinuxLinuxLinuxLinuxLinux
Ultra-fast PHPNoNoYesNoNoNo
In-Built Caching SystemLevel 1 Static CacheLevel 3 Database Query CachingLevel 3 Database Query CachingNoNoNo
SFTP And SSHYesYesYesYesYesYes
24/7 SupportYesYesYesYesYesYes
Support ChannelLive Chat/ Phone and EmailLive Chat/ Phone and EmailLive Chat/ Phone and EmailLive Chat/ Phone and EmailLive Chat/ Phone and EmailLive Chat/ Phone and Email
Priority SupportNoNoYesNoNoNo
Check Latest SiteGround PriceCheck Latest SiteGround PriceCheck Latest SiteGround PriceCheck Bluehost PriceCheck Bluehost PriceCheck Bluehost Price

All SiteGround’s hosting plans, including the StartUp now come with Dynamic cache and Memcached options. These features were previously available only on GrowBig and higher plans, but you can now safely add them to the StartUp one as well. Between 50% – 500% faster with Dynamic cache enabled. 

So, Which SiteGround plan is the best?

Each website will have different requirements depending on its content and the amount of traffic. Therefore, choosing the right hosting plan for your site is very important as this can save you lots of money and also help you with future performance issues.

We compared the performance and features of SiteGround’s Startup, GrowBig and GoGeek plan separately, in another post, to help you choose the most suitable SiteGround plan for your website.

Also Read:  How to choose between shared, VPS, Dedicated and Cloud hosting for your website?

Backup & Restore

Most hosting companies don’t provide regular backups unless you pay extra for the service.

However, that’s not the case with SiteGround, as they provide daily automated backups. You can restore the backup anytime you want with just one click.

Also, SiteGround lets us create an additional backup on demand. This is very important as you can back up all the files just before making any major changes to your website.

  • View SiteGround Backup Interface.

    SiteGround backup feature
    You can restore a backup by just clicking on a date and then the restore button.

Bluehost uses a third-party tool called CodeGuard for backup and restoration. It’s a great tool, but it will cost you an additional $8/mo.

★ Winner Tie. You decide. Bluehost offers cheaper plans, however, SiteGround’s higher price comes with better performance and features. 

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

4. Server Quality Test:- Which hosting is better for websites with high traffic?

SiteGround QualityBluehost Quality
The speed at 33 concurrent visits: 522ms602ms
 At 66 concurrent visits: 522ms33.4S
At 99 concurrent visits: 515ms 2 Minutes
 Hits: 570 Hits: 109
Errors:  0Errors: 5
 Average Response time: 572ms 20.5s
Fastest Response time: 459ms407ms
Slowest Response time:605ms2m 15s
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★
Rank: #1 in Server QualityRank: #5 in Server Quality

The server is where your website files are hosted and stored. High-quality servers will ensure a smooth experience for your visitors.

For this reason, we wanted to test the performance of each host server when 100’s of visitors are thrown at them at the same time. 

The green line indicates the number of visitors and the blue line represents the adjacent response time as the traffic increases.

  • View SiteGround server quality test result.

    My Server Location: Ashburn, USA

    SiteGround’s performance was rock solid. Their average response time was 500ms all the way to 100 concurrent users with no major spikes in load time.

    SiteGround server quality test

  • View Bluehost server quality test result.

    My Server Location: Ashburn, USA

    Bluehost’s performance was lackluster. Response time increased as the traffic increased. Even at lower levels of traffic (40 users), the response time was very high.

    As concurrent traffic increased to 60, the response time touched a high of 33.33s. Their performance was highly inconsistent with a significant variance from one second to another.

    Bluehost server quality test

As evident from the tests, SiteGround’s performance throughout this test was fast and consistent. That is due to many reasons, one of them is their recent deployment of a new MySQL setup that allows a much higher number of parallel requests to be processed simultaneously. This has a great impact on the effective handling of heavy MySQL queries and leads to a significant drop in the number of slow queries on their infrastructure, subsequently increasing the load capacity and the speed of the servers.

 Which Hosting Uses the Fastest Domain Nameserver?

You’ve probably heard the acronym DNS (Domain Name Server), but aren’t quite sure why it should affect your choice of web hosting.

Firstly, let me provide a short answer to the question: What is DNS?

When you type in a web address, eg., your ISP (Internet Service provider) goes to the domain name server (DNS) for that domain and fetches the IP addresses associated with that domain. This IP address is where your website’s files are located.

So basically, DNS is like a phonebook that helps your browser locate your website files.

Once you buy web hosting, most companies manage your DNS as part of their service. That means they host your DNS details on their server.

Benefits of a Better Domain Name Server Include

Therefore, we tested the DNS speed of both these hosting companies using a tool called SOLVEDNS.

  • View Bluehost Vs SiteGround DNS speed test result.

    Bluehost DNS speed
    – Bluehost-DNS-speed

    Below is an example of SiteGround’s DNS speed test. As you can see from the result, SiteGround’s DNS is slightly faster than Bluehost. The difference in speed is very small, but when you compare all the other tests we have done in terms of speed, it’s quite evident that SiteGround is much faster than Bluehost.

    SiteGround DNS speed
    – SiteGround-DNS-speed

5. Uptime Test – Do they fulfill their 99.99% uptime guarantee?

SiteGround UptimeBluehost Uptime
Uptime(Last 6 months): 100%Uptime(Last 6 months):99.97%
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★★
Rank: #1 in UptimeRank: #2 in Uptime

Uptime is the amount of time your website is up and running for your visitors. A lot of factors can affect the availability of your website.

Including –

  • Hardware failure
  • Server maintenance
  • Power shutdowns of your hosting company. 

That’s why this test is very important because low uptime can negatively impact your business’ bottom line through loss of credibility, lost sales, Google rank drops and more.

Both Bluehost and SiteGround guarantee 99.99% uptime guarantees.

Do they really fulfill this guarantee?

We used Host Tracker to monitor approximately 150 websites to determine a more accurate figure for web hosting uptime.

Bluehost vs siteground uptime comparison
Bluehost vs Siteground uptime comparison for the last four months.

The above graph provides you with a snapshot of how much better SiteGround performs in terms of uptime compared to Bluehost.

But around two years ago, Bluehost’s tech infrastructure had a major overhaul. Since then, Bluehost was able to deliver 99.99% uptime.

Even more, SiteGround compensates you with free hosting if your website falls below the guaranteed network uptime of 99.90%.

1-month free hosting for every 1% of uptime lost below 99.90%.

siteground uptime guarantee

★ Winner  SiteGround. Consistently delivering very high uptime of 99.99% during our testing.

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

6. Security – SiteGround is safer against multiple web threats and malware.

SiteGround SecurityBluehost Security
In-Built softwareCloudflare
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★★
Rank: #1 in SecurityRank: #3 in Security

SiteGround is another big factor that differentiates SiteGround from Bluehost.

SiteGround has a Proactive Approach to Security. Their security team develops advanced custom solutions and proactively patch vulnerabilities:

  1. In-house built server monitoring system performs server check every 0.5 sec, and is able to fix many issues automatically and much faster.
  2.  AI-anti bot blocks between 500,000 and 2M brute-force attacks every day and stops malicious traffic from reaching their clients’ sites.
  3. 24/7 security admin team watching over software vulnerabilities, writing WAF rules to protect servers and sites from hacking and breaches.

Another big advantage is that with their recent shift to Google Cloud data centers, you get the benefit of a security model that has been highly regarded as one of the best, which secures products like Gmail, Google search, Youtube, etc,. In fact, your website couldn’t ask for anything better.

Bluehost relies on Cloudflare to protect its customers from DDoS attacks. They also offer other security features, such as spam protection, password-protected directories, and an option to blacklist certain IPs.

★ Winner  SiteGround. 

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

Bluehost Vs SiteGround For Beginners – Which Hosting Is Good For Beginners?

SiteGround For BeginnerBluehost For Beginner
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★★
Rank: #1 in Beginner FriendlyRank: #2 in Beginner Friendly

Read More: How to start a WordPress Blog with SiteGround? A Guide for Beginners.

#Free migration for your website.

The manual transfer service was discontinued recently, and now users have to use the free SG migrator plugin to conduct a migration from another host over to SiteGround by themselves.

Earlier, SiteGround used to do a free manual transfer of your website from other hosting to SiteGround. However, now it’s a paid service.

Website transfer costs for each web host.

  1. SiteGround – $30 for manual transfer, free with SG migrator plugin.
  2. Bluehost – 149$
  3. HostGator – Free
  4. Kinsta – Free
  5. GoDaddy – Not available

7. Bluehost Vs SiteGround – WordPress is easy with SiteGround and Bluehost

SiteGround For WordPressBluehost For WordPress
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★★
Rank: #1 in WordPress HostingRank: #2 in WordPress Hosting

Choosing a web host with managed WordPress plans has a lot of benefits, such as pre-configured WordPress technologies, which allow you to use SSL and CDNs with little hassle and provide better overall performance.

Moreover, security is also better as the host can set the server up to protect against WordPress-specific threats.

#Bluehost and SiteGround are officially recommended by WordPress.

WordPress is a popular CMS and website building tool that powers over 30% of the entire web. Officially, they only recommend 3 hosting companies, and SiteGround and Bluehost are two of them.

SiteGround and Bluehosts-official-recommendation by WordPress

Additionally, SiteGround’s WordPress hosting (same as regular shared hosting plans) is available at very attractive rates. It features a number of great WordPress tools, including auto-updates and free WordPress migrations using their proprietary plugin.

Learn How to migrate your WordPress website using WP Migrator.

Also, their SG optimizer plugin promises to boosts the performance of your website by 200-300%

  • View SG Optimizer premium features

    • Lazy image loading (reduce the initial loading time of your website by downloading the images as visitors scroll down the page.)
    • Gzip compression, which compresses the webpage to save bandwidth.
    • HTML, Javascript minification.
    • Better browser caching.

These features will cost you a premium fee from other plugin developers.

To their server, they’ve added their proprietary SuperCacher that relies on NGINX tech to significantly boost speed. They also offer a free CDN.

Bluehost WordPress packages start at $20 per month. It offers similar performance to their shared hosting plans. 

Moreover,  80% of SiteGround’s 2 million domains are sites built on WordPress, which makes them very experienced in handling a WordPress website.

So, which WordPress host is better for WordPress: SiteGround or Bluehost?

In terms of performance and what’s included in the offer, SiteGround is a better choice for your WordPress website.

  • You can build a professional WordPress website with SiteGround in less than 5 minutes using this tutorial from SiteGround.

Additionally, Joomla and Drupal are some of the other popular CMS hosting options provided by SiteGround and Bluehost.

Cloud Hosting – Bluehost cloud is nothing but an extension of their shared hosting.

SiteGround For CloudBluehost For Cloud
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★
Rank: #1 in CloudRank: #4 in Cloud

SiteGround and Bluehost cloud hosting

Cloud hosting is based on innovative technology that makes use of multiple servers to accommodate your website files and software. It means that your website will be up and running even if one or more servers experience unexpected problems.

Read more: What Cloud Hosting really is?

Skip this part if you run a small business or if your website isn’t meant to earn a profit.

  • Which Cloud hosting is better?

    Do you really need cloud hosting?

    This is difficult to answer as it depends on a wide range of variables like the volume of traffic, the scripts on the site, and its optimization.

    Unlike the old VPS solution, the Cloud doesn’t need server restarts when more power is added to them or when a single major patch is applied.

    So there is no downtime during such events which guarantees better uptime and a lot more power at one’s disposal.

    The Cloud option is generally better because the machines are incredibly powerful and scalable.

    For example, if more CPU power is ever needed as a result of a sudden jump in traffic, more CPU cores can be added right away. Cloud Hosting is ideal for very popular sites with high levels of traffic.

    Which Hosting Company Offers Better Cloud Hosting? SiteGround or Bluehost?

    SiteGround’s Cloud hosting plan starts at a high price of $110/mo. They use next-generation LXC technology built on bare metal, meaning that you get your own machines with resources dedicated solely to your project and on the most reliable technology.

    Moreover, SiteGround servers can be scaled up to 16 CPU cores and 20 GB of RAM, which is quite a lot of power and is on par with dedicated plans. Moreover, Cloud comes with the HHVM, a revolutionary tool from the Facebook team for faster PHP execution, auto-scaling option, white-label hosting, collaboration tools, etc.

    Meanwhile, Bluehost Cloud Hosting starts at a price of $8.95, as the price tag clearly shows ( they have the same prices for shared accounts). However, it barely differs from a shared solution as it uses a shared network of VPS resources. So, it’s not really the same dedicated power.

    Therefore, SiteGround’s cloud hosting is more suitable for highly popular sites because they offer much more power.

Bluehost vs SiteGround – Which hosting uses the latest technology?

Bluehost and SiteGround use Apache + NGINX web server technology, running NGINX for static files and Apache for dynamic ones. They use the NGINX reverse proxy caching solution in front of Apache to cache static delivery in order to speed up performance. If you don’t know what this means, ignore it, just know that this is a popular formula used by major hosting companies.

Additionally, SiteGround shifted its entire infrastructure to Google Cloud Platform, where infrastructure is built on top of virtual machines, instead of bare metal servers. This fact helps in easy auto-scaling of resources during peak times. What this move also means is that your website is hosted on one of the fastest and most powerful networks which is used by big companies like Apple, Netflix, Youtube, and Gmail.

Apache VS  NGINX Servers – Which are better?

SiteGround has already released PHP 7.4. Conversely, Bluehost has not yet provided their customers with access to PHP 7.2 and are still running PHP 7.0. And support for 5.6 and PHP 7 will end after December.

PHP 7.4 was released on November 28,2019 and was available on SiteGround as early as December 14. SiteGround and Kinsta are the only two hosting companies to offer PHP 7.4 right now.

Importance of SiteGround PHP

  • Why PHP version is important?, and more about SiteGround and Bluehost’s PHP version

    PHP is a server-side programming and scripting language used nowadays for creating interactive dynamic websites, especially by WordPress. The version of PHP used by your server determines the speed at which your web page is loaded and executed. The later the version, the better the speed and reliability.

    Kinsta tested PHP 7.3 with a WordPress installation and here are the results.

    PHP 7.3 was a clear winner,  processing 3x more requests per second than previous PHP versions.

    php benchmarks for siteground and bluehost wordpress websites
    – PHP Benchmark for WordPress.

    Yet Bluehost still uses PHP 5.6 for all the old hosting accounts. When contacted, their support responded by insisting we cancel our current account and start a new hosting account with them to take advantage of their new servers with PHP 7.2 or pay 150$ for them to do it for us. And, they also said that existing servers with the older PHP version would be updated eventually, however, they didn’t know when that would be.

    Bluehost performance issue

    This can expose their clients to potential vulnerabilities and high-security risks. Based on this, I doubt Bluehost’s commitment towards security and performance.

Over the last 2 years, most sites have adopted HTTPS at a fast rate and HTTPS usage has increased from 40% to over 90% in the last 3 years according to Chrome stats.

Increase in HTTPS usage by different platform
– Chrome stats report on the increased HTTPS usage for the last 3 years.

However, one main issue with people moving towards HTTPS sites has been the slight increase in load time as a result. This was addressed by SiteGround using the latest TCP 1.3 and OCSP stapling method.

  • How does SiteGround’s TCP 1.3  and OCSP stapling method will make your website faster?

    Each time you access an HTTPS website, the encryption certificate is validated by Certificate Authority (CA) on each request. This creates a slight delay in accessing your website. However, with SiteGround’s TCP 1.3 and OCSP stapling method, this check gets handled by the web hosting server, and your visitor’s browser doesn’t have to do anything.

    SiteGround features TLS 1.3 and OCSP stapling
    All their shared and cloud accounts benefit from the TLS 1.3 and OCSP stapling features. These 2 features improve the speed of encrypted connections.

Furthermore, SiteGround is among the first hosting companies to provide QUIC speed technology for their websites. This technology helps websites load faster in areas with slow internet connections.

In fact, this protocol known as HTTP/3 is a new technology that promises to improve performance and security and will become the standardized version of HTTP.

On the other hand, Bluehost is much slower across the board in terms of updates and new features, which sets them pretty far behind SiteGround on the cutting-edge technology front.

8. Customer Support

SiteGround SupportBluehost Support
Average wait time: 5-10sAverage wait time: 2-3 minutes
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★
Rank: #1 in SupportRank: #4 in Support

Customer support is very important in dealing with day-to-day problems associated with websites including issues associated with downtime, server connectivity, or security.

A reliable and fast customer support team is what you should be looking for to solve these problems quickly, without affecting your website.

  • Which hosting offers better support? 

    • SiteGround customer service offers a 24/7/365 day live chat, a ticketing system, and a toll number for support. They have a wait time of less than 5 seconds for their live chat and less than 10 minutes for the ticketing system.
    • In contrast, I have waited more than 5 minutes on some other leading hosting companies live chats. They have enabled a feature which allows users to study the bio of each support representative’s skills, work experience, and user ratings. Moreover, they boast a wait time of less than 10 minutes for their ticketing system.
    • Likewise, Bluehost offers the same features. They have an attractive chat box which is available 24/7. However, their support isn’t quite as fast nor do they have the expertise to solve some high-end issues promptly.

Thus, I tried reaching both SiteGround and Bluehost live chat teams for support one after the other and here are the results.

Bluehost took 2 minutes to connect, whereas SiteGround managed to reply within a few seconds of connecting. Bluehost Support speed review

SiteGround support speed

SiteGround’s support is A+

SiteGround is mainly known for their excellent support in the web hosting industry, which is why many users choose to work with this company. This was evident when they won the Stevie Award for Best Customer Support for the year 2020, and 12 employer awards.

However, there were some complaints regarding long waiting times during April-June 2020. This was explained by SiteGround as one of those rare instances due to COVID, leading to a higher level of activity by all website users as online presence was becoming much more important for many businesses.

Best customer support to SiteGround
SiteGround won the Stevie customer support of the year award

Bluehost, on the other hand, outsource their support to third world countries and teams who have little knowledge about Bluehost and web hosting in general. Their Live chat mostly transfers chat requests to a higher authority, which means it will take another 48 hours to get a response. This can be quite frustrating and lead to downtimes lasting many days.

Bluehost and SiteGround's support comparison

Support waiting time for each host.

  1. SiteGround 0-6 seconds
  2. Kinsta 0-1 minute
  3. Bluehost 2-3 minutes
  4. HostGator 3-5 minutes
  5. GoDaddy 5-10 minutes

★ Winner  SiteGround.  The best support in the industry with very fast and knowledgeable team.

Visit SiteGround Visit Bluehost

Bluehost’s customer support team is pathetic most of the time..

Pathetic Bluehost customer support team
Twitter is full of complaints regarding Bluehost’s support team. There were around 6 unhappy customers expressing their dissatisfaction in just 6 hours.

9. User Interface

SiteGround InterfaceBluehost Interface
Site Tools ( Custom made)cPanel (Third party)
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★★★
Rank: #1 in InterfaceRank: #1 in Interface

The User Interface is what we call the control panel. Both these hosting companies used to come with cPanel.

However, starting from July 2019, SiteGround hosting will use their own inbuilt custom-made control panel called SiteTool, replacing cPanel. Existing clients will keep using cPanel until they switch them to the new panel.

SiteGround Site Tools Control panel
SiteGround control panel called Site Tool

SiteGround file manager

According to SiteGround, cPanel limits their ability to expand and integrate new technology to give you a secure and reliable website. Moreover, SiteGround has carefully analyzed years of data on which cPanel features most users rely on and incorporated those features into their new panel.

On top of that, they have added many cool features, such as the option to add collaborators to your site. You can use the collaborator feature to give and revoke access to your site to developers and clients without having to share your login details.

Here’s more on SiteGround Control Panel.

  • View more on SiteGround Control Panel.

Bluehost uses cPanel User Interface

cPanel the easiest and most common control panel across the blogosphere.

Additionally, cPanel comes with more than 52 one-click installers for popular scripts such as WordPress, Joomla, Weebly, etc. This is a great advantage for newbies who might be unfamiliar with the coding aspects of a website.

Bluehost cPanel: Try Demo

SiteGround Staging Tool

SiteGround offers an amazing tool to help customers test changes and new features without breaking their live website.

In short, this tool creates a development copy of WordPress and Joomla sites, which customers can experiment on to their heart’s content.

Using the SiteGround Staging environment means that any changes won’t affect the live website, enabling customers to determine, beforehand if what they’re doing will help or hurt their site.

Bluehost Vs SiteGround User Review

SiteGround User ReviewsBluehost User Reviews
Positive reviewsNegative
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★
Rank: #1 in User ReviewsRank: #4 in User Reviews

Here are some reactions from Twitter users regarding their experience using SiteGround and Bluehost.

  • SiteGround’s Twitter user reviews and reactions.


  • Bluehost’s Twitter user reviews and reactions.


SiteGround Or Bluehost – Who’s the Best in 2021?

SiteGround OverallBluehost Overall
RecommendedNot Recommended
Rating: ★★★★★Rating: ★★★
Rank: #1 OverallRank: #3 Overall
Visit SiteGroundVisit Bluehost

SiteGround is the perfect choice thanks to their performance, reliability, and excellent support systems.

Our verdict, in a nutshell, is that SiteGround is just an overall better business to work with and its services stand head and shoulders above Bluehost. This conclusion is based on the numerous tests we’ve run, but also our personal experience in using the services of the two firms.

SiteGround’s Net Promoter Score (NPS) is 62 compared to 46 by Bluehost. In essence, NPS measures how many customers are so pleased with their interactions with the firm.

To put that in context, an NPS score of above 50 means that a lot of customers are so happy with the brand that they are most likely to stick around because they see real value in that company. Moreover, this is the score of many industry-leading companies like Apple, Sony, and Amazon. While Bluehost’s NPS score of 46 is still good, it’s not as impressive as SiteGround’s.

Moreover, In 2020, SiteGround achieved a 97.7% customer satisfaction rate in their annual survey.

SiteGround is best for you and here’s why.

  • High uptime record of over 99.99% over the last five years.
  • 30-day money-back guarantee. You get your money back in full if you don’t like them.
  • Quality servers mean high-speed websites.
  • Timely automated backups.
  • Effective security team capable of protecting sites from attacks.
  • Knowledgeable and efficient customer support team.
  • 60% discounted price for the first billing cycle.

The EU recently passed a new law that helps to protect the privacy and personal information of people living in the European Union known as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Thus, any website that receives visitors from the EU must comply with the new law.

Both SiteGround and Bluehost are in full compliance with the GDPR.

Set up your web hosting with SiteGround now.

Bluehost Vs SiteGround FAQ

  • Do SiteGround and Bluehost Offer Free trial?

    • Bluehost and SiteGround offer 30 Day Full Money Back Guarantee.
  • What Does SiteGround do to Speed up your website?

    • Uses SSD drives for shared and cloud hosting platforms.
    • Uses Latest PHP versions.
    • Nginx used in conjunction with server software to cache and speed up the delivery of static content.
    • Uses Cloudflare CDN.
    • Comes with Supercacher plugin for Joomla and WordPress.
  • What payment methods do Bluehost and SiteGround Accept?

    • For SiteGround: VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover and PayPal

      For Bluehost:  Credit Card, PayPal, Check or Money Order, Purchasing Order and Mailing Address.

  • How long does the account activation take for SiteGround?

    • Shared server – Immediately
    • Cloud server – Up to a minute
  • How does SiteGround protect you from hackers?

    • Their Unique account isolation, Anti AI bot and Cloudflare CDN will make it impossible for hackers to penetrate your site.
  • Are Siteground and Bluehost servers PCI compliant?

    • SiteGround and Bluehost servers are PCI compliant by default.
  • How often is my website backed up by SiteGround?

    • SiteGround Keeps a cloud backup for 30 Days, you can restore with just a single click from the control panel.
  • Which Hosting is better for ranking higher in Google?

    • SiteGround website loads very fast. Speed is one of the important factors of ranking on Google.
  • Which SiteGround plan is best for you?

    • SiteGround GrowBig is the most popular plan for WordPress websites. However, if you want more power, SiteGround GoGeek is ideal.
  • Which Bluehost plan is best?

    • Bluehost Choice Plus is the most popular plan used by Bluehost customers. It has all the features required for setting up an average website.
  • Does SiteGround charge monthly?

    • Yes, monthly payment is possible with SiteGround. Higher billing cycle comes with bigger discounts.
  • How do you switch from Bluehost to SiteGround?

    • SiteGround offers free migration with its SG Migrator plugin. Once you purchase their hosting, contact their support and they will manually transfer your website from any hosting to SiteGround.

34 thoughts on “SiteGround Vs Bluehost: 9 Test to Decide “Who’s Best” in 2021?”

  1. I use Siteground for hosting my client sites and I subcontract to a person who uses Bluehost.I can definitely say (after hours and hours with both companies) Site ground wins hands down. I have had incorrect answers and unfulfilled promises for site fixes from Bluehost, really crazy chats with repeated clarifications needed for them. However, when I call Bluehost, I get MUCH better results (for Bluehost service).

  2. A month ago, I would have 100% agreed with your assessment. However, Siteground recently made major changes to their “support.” First of all, they make you go round and round through a bunch of tutorials, many of which don’t work, or bring you to dead links. Second of all, they COMPLETELY DID AWAY with chat. Now you have to submit a ticket and they may or may not hep you. If they do help you, they might push you to a tutorial or directions that don’t function. I’m so disappointed. They used to be such an amazing company. I’ve been with them for years and am now considering switching to another service.

    1. Hello Melissa,

      We heard such complaints regarding their support few weeks back. That was due to their recent shift to Google Cloud infrastructure and their COVID 19 sale of $0.99/mo. As a result, there were a high number of support request which created some delays.

      However, right now, I did multiple tests trying to reach their Live chat and it got connected within a minute. I hope this helps you.

  3. This is a CODVID 19 update. As convincing as your article is for SiteGround vs BlueHost; during this time, there is no way of predicting the outcome of any action with either site. I have been trying to transfer my domain from BlueHost to SiteGround for the last week now. After hours spent online with both companies, I have had at least 5 failed attempts to complete the transfer. SiteGround continues to ask for a new EPP code each time. BlueHost is prompt in giving the code, but it expires each time before SiteGround completes the transfer. Today, I get an 404 error message for customer service with SiteGround, I can’t place blame on anyone given the circumstances. However, at this point, I feel it is better to remain with BlueHost and try to work out any service problems. It is more important to get my website active now, so that I can use it to expand my contact with the outside world. Good luck to everyone staying online and active. Your online presence will be appreciated whether you have -100 followers on thousands. Stay safe.

  4. I likewise feel that siteground is superior to bluehost. I like the above screen capture you included of live visit reaction time.

    In the event that you are in a tough situation that is an ideal opportunity to check client driven methodology of these organizations. It is helpful to have those screen capture in this correlation.

  5. I likewise feel that siteground is superior to bluehost. I like the above screen capture you included of live visit reaction time.

    In the event that you are in a tough situation that is an ideal opportunity to check client driven methodology of these organizations. It is helpful to have those screen capture in this correlation.

  6. SiteGround is well above Bluehost for me in very aspect just like you said. They offer a premium service for a very good starting price. I am little worried about SiteGround’s renewal price, but they are really worth the price.

  7. Noor, I just went through your article and got a question for you. At the top of your article, where you have mentioned Siteground vs Bluehost Test Results, you have mentioned Siteground as the winner for Popularity test. But, in the popularity graph, you have shown below, it clearly seems like BlueHost, in spite of their growth only in the last few years.

    1. Hi Nirmal,
      Bluehost is a very old hosting company started in 1995 and that’s why they host more domains and more known among people. However, SiteGround relatively is a new company. And moreover, we are comparing growth percentage, and SiteGround is growing more rapidly than Bluehost in the last few years as you can see from the graph.

      Hope this answers your question.


  8. Great article! We are linking to this great content on our website.
    I don’t think WordPress recommendation is based on the performance of these hosting companies,
    I think its based on the amount they pay to WordPress for placing their name there.

    And I clearly agree with the fact that SiteGround web hosting is very fast in innovating new technologies for better performance.

    1. Hi Ryan,

      WordPress recommendation is not solely bases on the amount they get paid, they also state that they truly test these web hosting before placing them on their recommended list. However, the payment also plays a significant role in getting your hosting company placed in their recommendation page.


  9. I have used both Bluehost and HostGator and what I can say is that both of them offers great speed when tested using pingdom or Gmetrix tool. But, the problem I had with many other hosting was its ability to offer great speed when there are 100’s of visitors assessing your site at the site time.

    As seen from you Load Impact reliability test, SiteGround was able to maintain its great speed even when 100’s of users are thrown at them, whereas Bluehost has not been able to live up to that mark.

  10. Beautiful comparison noor. I like the way u went in detail about the two. For me bluehost is the way to go. There support is top notch for noobs like me. I m using it for more than a year now and never had any problems.

  11. Hi Noor,

    You have some great points about these hosting companies. Its to be noted that SiteGround renewal is expensive and thats one of the reason that I am still not with SiteGround.

    However, SiteGround is currently the best option for shared hosting if you have the budget.

    Thanks and Regards.

  12. Hi Noor,

    Your server quality test really helping me in my final decision. I have always had problems with web hosting when it comes to handling 100’s of traffic during peak times, and I had to try and test each hosting to be able to find a suitable hosting. However, that process was very time consuming and requires a lot of hard work.

    Thanks for this test result. I am leaning towards SiteGround.

  13. SiteGround is faster than Bluehost fromy my experience. And that is proved in this post by yours. Another excellent thing about SiteGround is their support. They are very fast in getting back with responses.

  14. I like Bluehost as they have decent speed, and uptime. However, I had some issue with their support from time to time. I can adjust with that considering the price difference between SiteGround and Bluehost.

  15. I have been with SiteGround from couple of years, one of the most striking feature about them is their backup and restore feature. Its very fast, accessible and efficient backup tool. There was many instance where I messed with my site code and the restore tool saved me from my crashed site.

  16. SiteGround support is excellent as mentioned in your review. Pricing is an issue with SiteGround. Will they be offering discount anytime soon ?

  17. Thanks for the review. I currently use GoDaddy and HostGator. I had a bad experience with BlueHost and will not ever use them again. Out of the three, I like HostGator the best. Easiest to use and best customer service. And, no down time.

  18. I believe key advantages of Siteground over bluehost and the others is the custom server set up and the instant asssistance. I recently started using siteground web hosting and I am glad to say that yes they have best 24/7 customer support as well as excellent WordPress hosting features. I have got my website setup in no time and all the hurdles manage by Sitegound’s very technical team. There cpanel interface is awesome.

  19. Thank you for this review.

    Your commentary about how Bluehost has been surpassed by SiteGround in the past couple years helps me make sense of the advice I have seen from so many bloggers who give advice on starting a blog.

  20. Thanks for your great review! I’m starting my blog and have seen different bloggers strongly recommend one of these over the other and I needed insight. Your article made it a no brainer! Thank you, a fellow Noor 😉

  21. I also feel that siteground is better than bluehost. I like above screen shot you added of live chat response time.
    If you are in trouble that is the time to check customer centric approach of these company. It is useful to have those screen shot in this comparison.

  22. I have a bluehost account with about a dozen websites (folders under the main account). My only problems are having to wait too long for chat and they no longer have a trouble ticket system. They have had some major down times but honestly most of them have been from outside problems.
    What I am wondering is how difficult would it be to move all my wordpress sites and the DB’s associated with them to site ground. It always makes me nervous to do whole moves like that.

  23. Thank you for your insightful review! I was vacillating back and forth between the two hosting companies. I actually was with Bluehost but having to commit to a 3 year deal to get the savings was out of budget. I ending up leaving. I started reading chatter about Bluehost not being the same as it was. I witnessed first hand of a site that was hosted by Bluehost and I noticed the lull in loading time.
    Anyway, I am thrilled to finally have decided. I’m still deciding if I should start with lowest plan or the grow big. I’m just starting. However, I am tech savvy and I’m planning to build other sites. Thanks for any feedback!

  24. Hi Noor,

    Congratulations for your professional work. You really help me to decide ( finally, it’s near 6 months thinking) about a correct and professional Hosting company. We go definitely for SiteGround as our Hosting company. One thing to remark is about the difference on the disk space ( SG max. 20 GB and BH unlimited) It is a little bit strange

    Again, many thanks

    B. rgds from Spain

  25. Pingback: Mark

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *