Category Archives: Web Hosting Review

SiteGround Vs Bluehost (Aug 2018) : 7 Tests, 1 Winner – IHB

SiteGround Vs Bluehost

Updated: August 1, 2018

Does choosing a hosting company give you nightmares? 

Are you having trouble choosing between SiteGround and Bluehost because you haven’t found any unbiased reviews that you can actually understand?

 Choosing the right hosting service is a nerve-wracking experience because hosting can make or break your website. You have to spend hours upon hours doing research, trying to understand what sounds like gibberish and then comparing all these companies. And biased reviews more intent on selling you something than being honest don’t make things much easier.

It’s not something you can avoid, though, because poor hosting can have your traffic dwindling to nothing – that’s if you manage to get any traffic in the first place. So, you have to put in the effort or watch your website crash and burn.

 You have another option that will require less time and won’t be nearly as aggravating. I’ve done all the legwork for you and you’ll find a comprehensive SiteGround vs Bluehost hosting comparison below, along with many other hosting reviews and comparisons, including HostGator vs Bluehost and HostGator vs SiteGround.

Bluehost was founded in 2003, whereas SiteGround made its entry into hosting in 2004.

SiteGround Vs Bluehost tests

  • BlueHost Vs SiteGround – SecurityTest
  • BlueHost Vs SiteGround – Uptime Test
  • SiteGround vs Bluehost Server Response Time
  • Bluehost vs SiteGround – Website Speed Test
  • SiteGround Vs Bluehost: Customer Support

If you are too busy to read this entire review, here's an infographic that covers the main points.

Bluehost vs SiteGround – Performance, Reliability, Speed test and Security

While SiteGround web hosting developed some highly innovative approaches and ideas such as their own SuperCacher, free CDN by Cloudfare, NGINX web server technology and SSD Drives(Bluehost uses HDD drives) to beat the competition and provide maximum performance to its users, Bluehost has flagged behind everything for the last 2-3 years.

SSD drives are more expensive, but haven proven to be faster and more reliable than HDD drives. Only a few hosting companies can boast that  their servers use SSD drives and SiteGround is one of them.

Apache VS  NGINX Servers – Which are better ?

SSD vs. HDD: What’s the difference?

SiteGround has already released PHP 7.2 RC, thereby fulfilling their promise to offer their customers the latest technology in a timely fashion. The new release will bring a number of improvements to speed, efficiency and security.

A few other new features SiteGround has recently introduced include:

  • The SiteGround Migrator plugin that helps customers migrate their WordPress site quickly and easily
  • An upgrade to the SG Optimizer plugin to include multisite support.

Conversely, Bluehost has not yet provided their customers with access to PHP 7.2 and are still running PHP 7.0. They’re also much slower across the board in terms of updates and new features, which sets them pretty far behind SiteGround on the cutting-edge technology front.

Read more:- PHP 5.6 Vs PHP 7.0 Vs PHP 7.1 Vs PHP 7.2 – Performance Analysis

The most recent survey sitground conducted among its customers shows a satisfaction score of 97% in 2017.

This score has steadily increased over the past three years, proving that SiteGround constantly strives to improve the quality of the services they offer.

Siteground Customer satisfaction survey for 2018

 

Look at this video to understand how SiteGround is able to secure our websites from all hackers and other security threats.

 

SiteGround vs Bluehost – Security

SiteGround has recently developed an anti-bot AI that protects their customers from brute-force attacks.

Read more :- What is Brute-force attacks and how it can destroy your website within minutes ?

The new bot prevention system has delivered amazing results as it blocks as many as 2 million attacks across their servers. Not only does the AI system protect customer websites, but it also frees up server resources that can now be used by customers.

The AI system monitors all SiteGround’s servers simultaneously and analyzes the data. Based on the results, it takes automatic action to stop malicious bots. Some of the flags the AI watches include:

  • Failed logins
  • How many simultaneous connects are present to different URLs
  • DDoS weaknesses that are already known in different apps
  • Various request types associated DDoS attacks
  • A constantly updating list of blacklisted user agents

When the AI determines that an IP is malicious, it blocks it and issues a challenge via a Captcha page. If the “puzzle” is solved, meaning that it’s actually a human and not a malicious bot, the address is whitelisted. And the AI learns from these situations so that it can reduce the level of false positives that occur.

Thus, SiteGround’s new security system is much more efficient at protecting customer websites.

Bluehost relies on Cloudflare to protect its customers from DDoS attacks. They also offer other security features, such as spam protection, password-protected directories, and an option to blacklist certain IPs.

Winner: SiteGround wins by a long-shot because they’ve developed their own AI to thwart brute-force attacks and aren’t relying on a third party to protect their customers.

BlueHost Vs SiteGround – Uptime Test

Both Bluehost and SiteGround offer 99.99% uptime guarantees.However, practice shows that Bluehost has significant and consistent issues with downtime, leading to an average uptime of less than 98% per month.

I haven’t seen anything that shows a major downtime for SiteGround. Moreover, they were up more than 99.99% during the last year. They have pretty much the most  in the entire web hosting industry.

SiteGround, on the other hand, does not exhibit any major problems with downtime. In fact, over the past year, their average uptime exceeded 99.99%. This proves that their servers are highly reliable and some of the best in the industry.

We used Host Tracker to monitor approximately 150 Bluehost and SiteGround websites to determine a more accurate figure for their uptime.

To see different estimates for uptime percentage, you can change the variables inthe following interactive graph Continue reading

SiteGround Vs HostGator – (Aug 2018) Which Is The Best Host?

Updated: August 1, 2018

Creating a website with a poor web hosting company is like building a house on quicksand. Eventually you are going to have structural problems. Because your web hosting company is so important, this review will compare two of the most popular: SiteGround Vs HostGator.

HostGator is a large webhosting and domain company with over 9 million domains and more than 400,000 clients using their service. Based in Houston, they have grown rapidly since their inception in 2002. They were acquired by Endurance International Group in 2012.

SiteGround was established in 2004 and now has 140 employees. They are strong supporters of open-source software, and have custom hosting plans for WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, Magento and other popular programs. Currently they host over 250,000 clients worldwide.

SiteGround and HostGator – Live review by current user

Lets start with live user review of SiteGround and HostGator by current users, posted by them in twitter.



As seen from the twitter feed, SiteGround have a very high customer satisfaction compared to HostGator.

SiteGround Vs HostGator-Uptime Report

As you can guess from the name, uptime is a critical measurement of web hosting companies. It is the total amount of time the company’s servers are up, operational and effectively serving websites for their clients.

SiteGround states they have a guarantee to be up 99.9% of the time. This guarantee applies across the board, no matter which plan you have. Much of their strength is in their custom programming, like a detection system they built which “sniffs out” potential downtime problems and automatically corrects them.

Similarly, HostGator guarantees to deliver 99.9% uptime. You get this guarantee whether you purchase the smallest intro plan, use the reseller plan or utilize their most complex dedicated server technology. A separate guarantee offers additional coverage for Network clients.

Let’s look at the raw numbers:

• The average 6-month uptime for SiteGround during our study (tested for 10 sites based in different parts of the globe): 99.99%. This means your website could potentially be off-line for just over four hours over six months of service.
• The average 6-month uptime for HostGator tested for 10 sites based all over the planet: also 99.99%. Like SiteGround, your site could be potentially be offline for around four hours over 6 months.

But consider this: SiteGround was online with no downtime for 100 percent of the time during long periods of our study. This is unusual for any web host, and a good testimonial for SiteGround.

Further, we are tracking uptime of a test website using Pingdom and here are the results.

Here are the test website used and the results.

For SiteGround- inlinehostblogger.com

Siteground uptime report for test website

For HostGator –  hg-inlinehosting.com

hostgator uptime for test website

 

From the above test result, we can conclude that SiteGround have a better uptime compared to HostGator.

Read our extensive Bluehost vs Siteground web hosting comparison review.

We have a unique interactive graph here that lets you enter different data points to see various results for each hosting service. This graph tracks real time uptime of around 150 websites hosted under these hosting companies.

 


More Extensive stats on HostGator can be read from this Bluehost Vs HostGator Vs DreamHost Review

★ Winner Tie.

Visit SiteGround Visit HostGator

SiteGround Vs HostGator – Speed Test

SiteGround had good quality speed results based on a unique quality of many open-source projects: They respond well to good caching systems. Knowing this, SiteGround built the SuperCacher, a custom-made cache process that keeps things moving fast. On the other hand, HostGator focused on employing more equipment and server layers to allow faster speeds and better service.

Take a look at these stats:

• The average speed of a website hosted on SiteGround (Optimized 10 sites): 1.1 seconds.
• The average speed of a website hosted on HostGator (Optimized 10 sites): 1.25 seconds.

HostGator looses to SiteGround on pure speed. SiteGround has made significant investments like VPS servers that use Supermicro Server Chassis, Dual AMD Opteron CPUs,SuperCacher, and RAID 10 Disk Arrays. To get a custom look at different speed scenarios,  I have conducted a speed test for 2 similar sites hosted on SiteGround and HostGator from different continents. To make it appealing, two websites used are similar in size, content, requests and attachments.

Speed Of Sites Hosted On SiteGround

Testing LocationTest 1Test 2Test 3
New York0.90.70.65
Amsterdam1.31.21.2
Melbourne2.42.52.4

Speed Of Sites Hosted On HostGator

Testing LocationTest 1Test 2Test 3
New York1.00.850.7
Amsterdam1.61.51.5
Melbourne2.21.712.0

As expected, SiteGround loaded faster in USA and Netherlands whereas HostGator tops in Australia. This is mainly due to the availability of servers for SiteGround in Netherlands and USA region. And also, their inability to have data centre in Australia, where HostGator manages to have a data centre.

Here’s a why website hosted on SiteGround is faster than HostGator.

★ Winner SiteGround.

Visit SiteGround Visit HostGator

Server Response Time

In essence, a web server is really a big hard drive in an off-site, secure location. The speed of each machine will make a big impact on how fast your site is. SiteGround, who put customer support and satisfaction above all, purposefully keep server loads low. That means they have room to allow for surges and seasonal increases, like during holidays and near the end of the year.

HostGator’s has an impressive battery of server arrays, which work instantly to balance loads and keep server response high.

These are the hard numbers:

• The average server response time for SiteGround over our 6 months study (10 Optimized sites): 650 ms.
• The average server response time for HostGator for the same time period (same 10 Optimized sites): 750 ms.

Here are some of the steps taken to ensure that all tests were fair as possible.

  • Each site is a WordPress site of Installation 4 with the same theme installed and same number of images, pages size, content and request.
  • All the plugins and catching system was disabled
  • The test was conducted several times and the best results are displayed here.
  • Server location of both this Hosting companies were located on Ashburn, VA, and Portland, Oregon.

The Green Line indicates the number of visitors and blue line represent the adjacent response time as the traffic increase.

Response time of SiteGround

Web Hosting: SiteGround

My Server Location: Dallas, TX
Hosting Server Location: Chicago, IL
Max Response Time: 1.6 seconds
Minimum Response Time: 669.9 milliseconds

SiteGround-Server Response TimeHave a look at the source and full test result from Load Impact for SiteGround

Response time of HostGator

Web Hosting: HostGator

My Server Location: Portland, OR
Hosting Server Location: Charlotte, NC
Maximum Response Time: 3.2 seconds
Min Response Time: 658.07 milliseconds

HostGator Server Response Time

Click here to have a look at the source and full test result from Load Impact for HostGator

Recently, another test was conducted on a smaller test website from a different location, and the result was similar.

Response time of SiteGround – 90ms

2ND SiteGround server response time TEST

Response time of HostGator – 120ms

siteground vs hostgator server response time

This concludes the superiority of SiteGround’s server over HostGator with a 1.5x faster performance.

★ Winner SiteGround. Again, SiteGround gains an edge over HostGator.

 

HostGator Vs SiteGround – Control Panel

Control Panel is where you manage all the backend part of your website. This is where you make major design changes, coding changes to your website. The ease and flexibility in using the control panel play a huge role in successful and speedily development of your website.

Both these hosting use Cpanel as their control panel, except some design and feature changes, most of the functionalities are the same.

SiteGround cPanel: Try Demo

★ Winner:  Tie

#HostGator vs SiteGround – Free migration (Transfer)

If you are someone new or someone with limited web development knowledge, it will be a tedious task for you to transfer your existing website from your current hosting to the newly chosen one.

SiteGround makes this process very easy with their super cool expert team transferring your website in less than 24 hour. Additionally, this service comes free of cost.

Similarly, HostGator offers the same service free of cost.

Here are some more details on free transfer service of HostGator.

Hostgator vs Siteground free migration

Benchmark Test

For each web hosts, I’ve identified a set of 10 websites all hosted on different web servers. A total of 825 requests were then sent to each host in order to measure the performance of their servers.

 HostGatorSiteGround
Completed Requests825825
Failed Requests77
Requests per sec.6.266.9
Time per request157.09 ms179.07 ms
Average transfer rate63.83 Kbytes/sec62.8 Kbytes/sec
Median connect time12.6 msec13.8 msec
Median processing time142.49 msec148.59 msec
Median waiting time135.71 msec138.71 msec
These two companies are very close in median processing time, a good general benchmark on their overall performance. However, HostGator has a dominant superiority, a result of constant server upgrades and a strong partnership with SoftLayer.

★ Winner HostGator. HostGator wins in processing, waiting and connect time. While several data points were very competitive, the nod goes to HostGator for this section.

Visit SiteGround Visit HostGator

Pices, Plans And Features

SiteGround has a wide variety of hosting service plans for everyone from individuals to large organizations. They are especially suited to open-source projects like the popular ecommerce platform Magento.

HostGator also has a number of plans, from low cost starter plans to full VPS hosting and dedicated servers.

FeaturesSiteGround StartupSiteGround GrowBigHostGator HatchlingHostGator Baby
Disk Space1020 GBUnmeteredUnmetered
Traffic Allowed10000 Visits25000UnmeteredUnmetered
Email AccountsUnlimitedUnlimitedUnmeteredUnlimited
Domains Allowed1Unlimited1Unlimited
Control PanelcPanelcPanelcPanelcPanel
1 Month$3.95$6.45$0.01 coupon:HGHOSTING99$0.01 coupon:HGHOSTING99
12 Month$3.95$6.45$5.95. 50% coupon code: HGHOSTING30$8.95. 50% coupon code: HGHOSTING30
3 Year Term$3.95$5.95$3.95. 50% coupon code: HGHOSTING30$5.95. 50% coupon code: HGHOSTING30
web hosting ratinghosting company ratingweb hosting reviewshosting reviewsWeb Hosting ratings
Sign Up
web hosting ratinghosting company ratingweb hosting reviewshosting reviewsWeb Hosting ratings
Sign Up
Web hosting company ratinghosting reviews and ratingweb hosting reviewhosting ratingWeb hosting company rating
Sign Up
Web hosting company ratinghosting reviews and ratingweb hosting reviewhosting ratingWeb hosting company rating
Sign Up

Check Latest SiteGround Prices Check Latest HostGator Prices

Steps to High Performance

SiteGround early on niched themselves in the world of open-source software with customized plans tailored around specific packages like Joomla and Drupal. Their server response time is on par with competitors, although not at the top of the industry. Rather, they have concentrated on superior customer satisfaction.

Hostgator has increased investment in their infrastructure including more enterprise-class servers, 24-hour monitoring and stronger UPS backup capability. Their partnership with SoftLayer, a cloud computing provider, has given them increased capability and speed to service customers.

Customer Support

SiteGround offers telephone support in addition to chat and an email-oriented ticket system. The ticket system boasts a “first reply” within ten minutes, while live chat and telephone support are almost instantaneous.

HostGator has beefed up support to deal with their strong growth in the last few years. They have built an entire support portal on their site with quick access to live chat (Still has longer waiting time compared to SiteGround), ticket submission or billing management. There is also a customer forum with lots of quality content built up over years of service.

SiteGround Support Waiting Time – 0 Minute (Instant)

SiteGround support waiting time

HostGator Support Waiting time – 0 Minute (Instant)

HostGator support waiting time

★ Winner SiteGround. Both Web hosting companies have a fast, knowledgable and friendly support team to help on problems associated with our website.

Visit SiteGround Visit HostGator

HostGator vs. SiteGround – My Recommendation

We’ve taken a good look at the features and benefits of two of the most prominent web hosting services on the Internet. No other site looks as closely as we do at customer support, uptime, site speed and overall performance.

That said, my recommendation is to go with SiteGround. Their considerable client base allows them to continue to invest heavily in increasingly complex server technology like DDR3 ECC Ram and customized hardware specs. The end result is their servers are faster, have better uptime and make fewer errors. For that reason, I can easily recommend SiteGround as the home for your next web hosting.

HostGator Vs SiteGround Score Sheet

SiteGround: 2 win

HostGator: 1 win

Tie: 4

Visit SiteGround Visit HostGator

Coupon Code for HostGator And SiteGround

SiteGround Provide limited time 60% Discount coupon code.

Get 60%  Discount coupon code.

30% HostGator Coupon code :  IHB30

$9.99 HostGator coupon code :HGHOSTING99

WP Engine Vs Bluehost – The Best Webhost Revealed

Updated: August 1 , 2018

It can be a challenge to select the right web hosting company because it seems like they all promise the same benefits: good uptime, fast servers and speedy websites at a low cost. But as we all know, often you make a purchase and find out later that the quality is less than what you expected when you bought the product.

In the case of web hosting, making the wrong decision can impact your life on several fronts – often your website is the core of your entire marketing effort. This article will help you understand the features and benefits of two of the most popular web hosting services on the market: WP Engine vs Bluehost:

  • WP Engine is an Austin-based web hosting company that was founded in 2010. Rather than work with several software packages, they have solely focused on WordPress hosting services. WordPress is the most popular content management system on the Internet, currently making up around 18% of total websites.
  • Bluehost is a popular web hosting company founded in 1996 and currently owned by Endurance International Group, who also own web hosting services like HostMonster and iPage. Based in Provo Utah, they currently have over 1 million hosted domains on their system.

Also read: Arvixe vs Bluehost

 

WP Engine Vs Bluehost – Uptime Report

Perhaps the most important part of a web hosting service is that the system is reliable and the website delivers web pages when customers and prospects logon to your site. The term “uptime” refers to the amount of time that a web hosting company keeps their servers online and working for clients. As a customer, you want a service that has a very high uptime percentage.

WP Engine has a highly competitive uptime percentage rate of 99.9%. They are able to achieve this number due to a variety of technical advancements:

  • Closely managed upgrade paths and daily backups.
  • A unique staging area where clients can pretest themes, plug-ins and new webpages without affecting their lives site.
  • A curated list of useful themes, plug-ins and other tools that help clients assemble the best WordPress features for their use case.
  • Snapshots of your entire website that can be restored with one click of a mouse.
  • Unlimited storage and data transfer ability.
  • A powerful caching system called EverCache which greatly speeds up large files like images.

Here are their respective results for a typical six-month uptime period for WP Engine and Bluehost:

  • Average 6-month uptime for WP Engine (tested for 10 sites based in different parts of the world): 99.99%. That means your site would possibly be down almost 4.4 hours over 6 months of service.
  • Average last 6 month uptime for Bluehost (Tested for 10 sites based in different parts of the world): 99.75%. Your website could be down potentially up to 10 hours with this uptime percentage. This is the worst uptime we have tested in our series of web host reviews. It affects you directly because every minute your website is down it costs you money.

It is plain to see that WP Engine has a much better uptime percentage then Bluehost. To see different estimates for uptime percentage, you can plug-in various data points into the following interactive graph, which shows uptime of 150 websites hosted under these hosting ompanies.


Winner :- WP Engine

  Visit Bluehost Visit Wp-Engine

WP Engine Vs Bluehost – Speed Test

Along with a good uptime report, your web host should be able to demonstrate that their services are fast and efficient. Site speed is a common quality people look for in a good web hosting firm, and for good reason. The search engine Bing recently finished a study where they determined that an additional 1.5 seconds wait results in up to 4.4% reduction in revenue, clicks and customer satisfaction. Without a doubt, fast site speed is a major factor in the success of your website.

WP Engine is able to deliver speedy websites mainly because they concentrate on optimizing their servers for the WordPress platform. If you’re not familiar with WordPress, it is an open source content management system. Originally only for blogs, it has grown into a robust website manager. However, it does use a lot of resources and a web host that is specifically geared to maximize its speed and effectiveness has lots of value.

On the other hand, Bluehost is not specifically optimized for any content management system. They provide users with their SimpleScript installation system, which installs popular CMSs like Drupal and Joomla with one click. Another obstacle to Bluehost speed is their CPU throttling scheme.

What this means is that if they find that a website on their system is using too many resources, they will throttle that site, severely impacting its speed and service. However, Bluehost says that throttling will only happen when a specific website is using more than 10 percent of the server’s overall capacity. The goal is to prevent all of the websites on that server from going down. Many users say it slows all the sites on the same server, however.

Here are the hard numbers we determined from our research:

  • Average speed of website running with WP Engine (Optimized 10 sites): 1.3 seconds.
  • Average speed of website running with Bluehost (Optimized 10 sites): 1.8 seconds.

It is plain to see that WP Engine beats Bluehost in website speed by .5 seconds. While this may not seem like a long time, when you are talking about serving thousands of pages it adds up fast. Below you’ll find the speed test result of Wpengine.com and Bluehost.com. Wpengine.com loaded much faster than Bluehost.com even after having a much higher page size.

Wp-Engine-vs-bluehost-Speed-Test
Wp Engine and Bluehost – Website Speed Test

Winner :- WP Engine

Server Response Time

What is server response time? It is the amount of time it takes for a web host server to deliver all of the elements of a webpage to your browser. WP Engine is able to deliver a fast server response time mainly due to their optimization technology centered on WordPress. WordPress has unique characteristics that need tweaking in order to get the most out of it. WP Engine has learned all of those quirks and tuned their servers to take advantage of them.

Bluehost is positioned as a premium service compared to HostMonster and other services under the Endurance International Group umbrella. However, their server response times are not that different than their sister hosting services. This is a breakdown of the server response times for both Bluehost and WP Engine:

  • Average server response time of WP Engine for last 6 months (10 optimized sites):  200 ms.
  • Average Server response time of Bluehost for last 6 months (Same 10 optimized sites):  290 ms.

Again, WP Engine has a clear lead over Bluehost. WP Engine clocks in at 200 ms for average server response time during our study, while Bluehost came in at 290 ms.

This interactive graph will let you take a look at different date ranges and the relative response times for each company during those time periods.

Winner :- WP Engine

WP Engine Vs Bluehost – Benchmark Test

For each web hosts, I’ve identified a set of 10 websites all hosted on different web servers. A total of 825 requests were then sent to each host in order to measure the performance of their servers.

BluehostWp Engine
Completed Requests825825
Failed Requests773
Requests per sec.7.156.46
Time per request220.89 ms165.09 ms
Average transfer rate63.83 Kbytes/sec55.8 Kbytes/sec
Median connect time19.8 msec12.8 msec
Median processing time200.08 msec msec144.49 msec
Median waiting time250.71 msec145.77 msec

WP Engine is a dominant leader over Bluehost in our benchmark tests. They have a fraction of the failed requests that Bluehost had, and are significantly faster in median connect, processing and waiting times. In processing time alone, WP Engine is almost twice as fast as Bluehost.

Winner:  WP Engine – with international data centers around the world and extreme focus on WordPress optimization, WP Engine is able to deliver processing speeds much faster than Bluehost, making them a clear winner in our benchmark tests.

  Visit Bluehost Visit Wp-Engine

 Hosting Plans

WP Engine tries to make it easy for potential clients to sign up for their service by concentrating their hosting plans under for designations: Personal, Professional, Business and Enterprise. If you are an individual service provider or creative worker, the Personal level will fit your needs best. It allows you to have up to 25,000 visitors per month, which should be plenty for a beginning business. If your operation is more mature, you might consider the Professional level in order to get more bandwidth and website space for your files.

Bluehost offers shared, WordPress, VPS and dedicated hosting levels. Their most popular option is the shared hosting which starts at only a few dollars per month. VPS hosting starts at around $30 per month, and dedicated hosting begins at approximately $150 per month. The starter plan for shared hosting includes one domain, 25 subdomains, 100 GB of web space, and 500 MB of e-mail storage. The Plus plan has unlimited webspace, subdomains and bandwidth.

This chart has a detailed look at all of the prices and plans of both WP Engine and Bluehost.
FeaturesWpengine Personal PlanWpengine Professional PlanBluehost SharedBluehost Plus
Disk Space10 GB20 GB100 GBUnlimited
BandwidthUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Email AccountsUnlimitedUnlimited100100
Domains Allowed1102Unlimited
Free DomainNoNoYesYes
Control PanelIts Own PanelIts Own PanelcPanelcPanel
For 1 Month$29.00/mo$99.99/moNo Monthly PlansNo Monthly Plans
12 month Plan$29/mo + 2 month free hosting.$99/mo + 2 month free hosting$6.99$8.95
2 Year TermNilNil$6.55$8.95
3 Year TermNilNil$5.55$8.95
Sign Up Now!Sign Up Now!Sign Up Now!Sign Up Now!

 

Winner :- Bluehost

  Visit Bluehost Visit Wp-Engine

Steps to High Performance

WP Engine has focused their brand on customer service and reliability. Some may feel that their focus on stability might come at the expense of overall performance. However, WP Engine has powerful stats for both uptime and site speed, indicating their commitment to speedy service for both small customers and enterprise clients alike.

Bluehost seems to be more suited to clients looking for an economical solution. While they have low rates for entry-level services, it comes at the expense of many sites on the same server. This can be a problem ultimately if one of these sites is throttled, or one of the sites goes down for any reason. The technology at Bluehost should accommodate these events without interruption, but their uptime numbers reflect that they have more difficulty with stability and reliability than WP Engine.

Customer Support

WP Engine works with a number of prominent clients in tech, publishing, media and other high-profile fields. These companies include SoundCloud, GeekWire, Constant Contact, Maxcon and AMD. These clients have provided a variety of positive testimonials to WP Engine based on their good experiences in better security, faster websites and better customer support than their previous web hosting service.

Bluehost offers e-mail support, an extensive knowledge base, a user forum, video tutorials, ongoing system status reports, online chat and a ticket support system. However, there are a number of reports on the web about poor or slow customer support from the company.

Winner :- WP Engine

Last Two Years

WP Engine is a company built by lovers of technology. They enjoy pushing the boundaries of the services and products they work with on a daily basis. As evidence, you only need to look at their project Mercury. This is an innovative new platform that will deliver WordPress website server speeds at 10 times the current rate. While still in testing, it shows the commitment WP Engine has to developing the best service possible for their clients.

Bluehost offers a variety of features, and their upper-level hosting packages include the use of open source programs like OpenStack, instant provisioning, RAID storage and the ability to add storage on-the-fly. However, their technological advancements do not match up to the achievements WP Engine has been able to present in the last few years.

  Visit Bluehost Visit Wp-Engine

Control Panel

WP Engine has had several comments about their fairly functional control panel. Many customers come from other web hosts that use more elaborate control panels like cPanel. When they come to WP Engine, it takes them a little time to get used to the custom control panel the company uses. However, most customers agree that the unique benefits of the WP Engine systems like pre-staging more than make up for the plain look of the control panel itself.

Bluehost has adapted and modified the cPanel control panel to come up with a unique design. With a single sign-on, clients can access a single location to manage their email, billing, domains and much more.

Winner:- Bluehost, cPanel is the most used control panel and easiest of all.

WP Engine Vs Bluehost – My Recommendation

After extensive testing over several months, and closely evaluating the strengths of WP Engine vs Bluehost, my recommendation is to use WP Engine. While the entry-level cost is a little higher than Bluehost, the gains in speed, stability, reliability, customer support and advances in technology far outweigh the potential savings at a mass web hosting company like Bluehost.

If you are specifically looking for a non WordPress CMS hosting, Bluehost and HostGator is a better choice. This Bluehost Or HostGator review can help you choose a better option w.r.t non wordpress hosting.

 Click here to start using WP Engine

Disclosure: This site is run by a group of like-minded webmasters, whose mission it is to provide the public with honest web hosting reviews to ensure they meet our expert criteria. We do receive compensation for all the products that we review, which in turn helps us finance our work and provide users with honest reviews. All the products mentioned on our site are tested and evaluated before any reviews are written.

SiteGround Vs Inmotion Hosting (Aug 2018) – Which is Better?

Updated: August 1 , 2018

If you are in the market for a web host for a new site, or are considering moving to a new service, two names you’ll hear mentioned often are SiteGround and InMotion Hosting. Both have been in the hosting space for a long time — SiteGround since 2004 and InMotion since 2001. Let’s take a closer look at these two companies and determine which one is best for you.
I would also recommend to read SiteGround or Bluehost ? comparison review.
SiteGround Vs InMotion Tests

Seven tests were developed to help us examine these web hosts up close to determine where each one shines. The tests are:

  • SiteGround Vs. InMotion Uptime
  • SiteGround Vs. InMotion Website Speed Test
  • Website Server Response Time
  • Benchmark Test
  • Customer Support
  • Control Panel with Demo
  • Credibility Test

SiteGround Vs InMotion Uptime

SiteGround offers the same 99.9% uptime guarantee with each hosting plan it sells. According to our testing, SiteGround backs up its guarantee with a solid performance. We have tested it for as long as six months without significant downtime at all. This is due to its custom built alert system that finds potential bottlenecks and fixes them automatically.

InMotion also has a 99.9% uptime guarantee. It backs up this guarantee with their innovative Max Speed Zone option that is available for Business Class and higher plans. This system lets clients choose which data centre their information will be accessed from.

Uptime Report of SiteGround (June 2015)

SiteGround-Vs-Inmotion-Hosting-Uptime-report
Uptime score of SiteGround June 2015 – 99.99%
Uptime Report of SiteGround(December 2014)

siteground-uptime-report-december-2014
Uptime report of SiteGround Hosting(Dec-2014) :99.98%
Uptime Report of SiteGround(March-April 2015)

siteground-uptime-report-march-april-2015
Uptime report of SiteGround Hosting(March – April 2015) :99.99%, There was only one downtime which lasted for 4 minutes.
 Uptime Report of SiteGround(September 2014)

siteground-september-2014-uptime-report
Uptime report of SiteGround Hosting(September-2014) :100%, There was no downtime during this period.
 Uptime Report of SiteGround(April – May 2014)

siteground-uptime-report-april-may-2014
Uptime report of SiteGround Hosting(April – May 2014) :99.89%, It’s not a bad uptime number.

Winner: SiteGround – SiteGround relies on its superior engineering staff to create creative in-house solutions.

SiteGround vs InMotion Website Speed Test

Many website owners who utilize open-source software are partial to SiteGround. The reason is SiteGround has designed its hosting service to offer maximum performance to open-source custom management systems like WordPress. For example, SiteGround created the SuperCacher, a powerful cache program that maximizes throughput for popular software programs.

InMotion, based in Los Angeles, utilizes several Tier 1 service providers accessed via BGP. It also has a route optimizer that makes sure that the system employs the quickest routes for data transfer. The firm has 20GB of connectivity using the power of a 10GB Ethernet pipe. This technology creates direct data connections which allow it to create superior server response.

SiteGround Speed test
SiteGround Speed test
 Inmotion-Hosting-speed-test

Inmotion-Hosting-speed-test

Winner: SiteGround – optimized servers and a global footprint provides fast access.

Website Server Response Time

With servers on three continents, located in Amsterdam, Chicago and Singapore, SiteGround has geographical proximity for excellent throughout and reliable website server response. They have partnered with several carriers in each region to minimize the “hops” each data packet must take to arrive at its destination.

In their West Coast data center in Los Angeles, InMotion implements a network core built by Brocade. Their system has several layers of redundancy utilizing multi-homing. In addition, they have LAN redundancy filtered through three layers of protocols like 802.3ad. In their East Coast data center located in Herndon, Virginia, the company has level 3 peering partners, a carrier grade network core and also multiple layers of redundancy.

My Server Location: Dallas, TX
Hosting Server Location: Chicago, IL
Max Response Time: 1.6 seconds
Minimum Response Time: 669.9 milliseconds

Siteground server response time
Siteground server response time

My Server Location: Portland, OR
Hosting Server Location: Washington DC
Max Response Time: 837.78ms
Minimum Response Time: 498.42ms

Inmotion Hosting server response time
Inmotion Hosting server response time

Winner: SiteGround’s large worldwide footprint provides fast server response around the globe.

Benchmark Test

SiteGround performed well in several of the benchmark tests we set up. These are very specific evaluations in areas such as Average Transfer Rate and Time Per Request. InMotion also posted competitive results – each web hosting service was superior to the other in different categories.

Winner – Tie. Depending on the category, each service traded the lead. In the final analysis, they crossed the finish line neck and neck.

Customer Support

With each of their all hosting plans, InMotion provides Premier Support, their branded support level that gives clients access to support channels such as live chat, e-mail ticketing, phone support, online tutorials and an extensive question and answer system supported by the community. InMotion also provides many tutorials online to help clients with questions and technical concerns.

SiteGround has consistently offered a thorough system of online chat, e-mail access, and telephone support. They are set up to answer the majority of e-mail queries within 10 minutes. Their Live chat responds with 10 seconds of reaching them. They have best customer support in the entire web hosting industry.

Winner: Tie. InMotion has a deep reservoir of content online that addresses hundreds of support questions, ensuring customers get fast answers, whether that utilize the company support channels or do-it-yourself options.

Control Panel with Demo

Like many leading hosting services, InMotion utilizes the cPanel control panel. This popular control panel makes it easy to modify page content, create new e-mail addresses, manage passwords and handle the myriad of tasks website owners must deal with on an ongoing basis.

SiteGround also offers clients cPanel. It is a robust system that has grown rapidly and become pervasive in the industry due to its ease of use and technical superiority.

Winner: Tie. Take advantage of the working demos at each web host to see how easy the system is to use.

Credibility Test

Unlike some of the huge web hosting providers, both InMotion and SiteGround have taken a slow growth, customer-focused approach. InMotion has garnered many awards for web hosting going back many years.

Similarly, SiteGround also has garnered a loyal following from their customers by optimizing their infrastructure for maximum performance of popular software programs such as WordPress and Drupal.

Look at the video which explains SiteGrounds Excellent Security System.

Winner: Tie. Both vendors have worked hard on their reputation and have garnered strong credibility points in the marketplace.

SiteGround Vs InMotion – Which Should Be Your Choice?

We have come to a conclusion that SiteGround beats InMotion hosting in the majority of department and we would recommend SiteGround over InMotion.

In summary, SiteGround offers:

  • A global footprint dividing fast access from around the world.
  • Cutting-edge data centers featuring multiple failover and backup systems.
  • Steady, slow growth business model with fanatical attention to customer service.
  • A remarkable uptime performance, easily achieving the 99.9% guarantee.
  • Powerful, custom-made caching program.
  • Friendly, informative tech support with multiple channels.

Arvixe Vs Bluehost (Aug 2018) – Which is Right for You?

Updated: August 1, 2016

Arvixe vs BluehostThis head to head review of Arvixe vs Bluehost puts an up and coming web hosting company against one of the most well known hosting giants in the world. Both offer a lot of value to their customers, especially when it comes to reliability and hosting add-on features. We have also reviewed HostGator vs Bluehost in another post in this blog.

Arvixe Vs. Bluehost Tests

The following tests were performed on each hosting service provider to determine which one came out on top:

  • Arvixe Vs. Bluehost: Uptime
  • Arvixe Vs. Bluehost: Website Speed
  • Server Response Time
  • Benchmark Test
  • Customer Support
  • Control Panel and Demo of Control Panel
  • Credibility

Arvixe Vs. Bluehost: Uptime

Arvixe offers an uptime guarantee of 99.9% with each of their hosting plans. If a customer experiences less uptime than their guarantee, Arvixe will refund them for the entire month of hosting. They’re able to offer such a guarantee because of what they call the “Arvixe Advantage”; their personalized support system that includes a team of server specialists and programmers that work around the clock to ensure everything is running smoothly.

Bluehost offers a similar uptime guarantee, but with an extra feature that most hosting companies have yet to implement. One of their hosting plans, known as “Cloud Sites” stores the actual website in the cloud and on two other separate devices. While Arvixe offers Cloud Hosting as well, Bluehost  doesn’t charge extra for the service, and if something were to happen to the website that caused it to crash, the backup version of the website would automatically take over.

We are currently tracking uptime of several web hosting companies with a help of a popular uptime tracking tool called Host-tracker. Here is the uptime of website hosted under Arvixe and Bluehost for last several month.

Site Hosted On Arvixe

Site Hosted On Bluehost

★ Winner Arvixe is the winner because they use a unique redundant system to ensure its websites are up nearly 100 percent of the time, which places the company just above Bluehost for this test.

Visit Arvixe Visit BlueHost

Arvixe Vs. Bluehost: Website Speed

Website speed is essential for any business because slow load times often result in high bounce rates. Both Bluehost and Arvixe offer a variety of specialized hosting packages, including Drupal, Joomla, WordPress and Magento.

We tested hundreds of websites for both hosting companies. For a  typical website of 1 MB page size,  Arvixe load times averages around 1.2 seconds, while Bluehost websites averaged around 1.64 seconds. While the difference in load times is less than a half a second, this gap increased dramatically when website speed was tested on websites with flash graphics and video backgrounds.

Speed Of Website Hosted on Arvixe

Arvixe Website Speed test

Speed Of Website Hosted on Bluehost

Bluehost Website Speed test

★ WinnerArvixe is the winner and outpaced Bluehost by nearly a half second.

Server Response Time

Server response time, similar to website speed, is also an essential factor that must be considered when looking into both Arvixe and Bluehost.

Bluehost guarantees faster speeds for its “Business Pro” hosting customers. This means that customers will likely have to pay more money to guarantee that servers respond to requests from the website in a reasonable timeframe.

Arvixe offers the same server response time regardless of which package is purchased. They can do this because, since the company was founded in 2003, they’ve used superior servers and software within their data centers.

We tested load time and server response time of websites hosted on HostGator and Bluehost using Load Impact App.

Response time of site hosted on Arvixe

Max Response Time: 2.1 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 900.0 milliseconds

Arvixe Response time

Response time of site hosted on Bluehost

Max Response Time: 2.6 seconds

Minimum Response Time: 915.53 milliseconds

Bluehost server response time
Bluehost server response time

★ Winner Arvixe is the winner of this test. The company has always used exceptional server equipment that allows them to offer faster server response times for their customers.

Visit Arvixe Visit BlueHost

Benchmark Test

The Benchmark tests a variety of factors that should be considered when you purchase hosting, including the Average Transfer Rate, Time Per Request and more.

With more years of experience and a solid growth plan under their belt, Bluehost has been able to keep up with the swelling amount of customers that flock to purchase their hosting services. They’ve been able to keep these key metrics at a manageable level, which means websites hosted with them perform well when multiple requests are initiated at once.

★ WinnerBluehost is the clear winner for this test. Arvixe needs to grow with the needs of its customer base and expand their server storage at the same time.

Customer Support

Arvixe vs bluehost customer support

Quality of customer support should be one of the most important factors that goes into choosing a hosting company. Both Arvixe and Bluehost do a great job with customer support.

Bluehost offers live chat, phone support and self-answer feature that lists most of the common questions. Their customer support team is available 24 hours a day however, it seemed to take longer for a support rep to answer a chat request and phone request when we tested the system during nighttime hours.

Arvixe is also very well known for the exceptional level of customer service they provide to their customers. While the company did run into trouble in October of 2015 with long wait times while employees were upgrading servers, Arvixe solved the problem immediately by hiring more customer support employees that were well trained and focused on fixing every problem as efficiently as possible. Arvixe offer a number of different support outlets, including an open forum, 24/7 phone number, live chat feature, and a team of programmers that work around the clock just incase a major hosting problem occurs.

★ WinnerThe “Arvixe Advantage” program that was recently implemented by the company has propelled them way ahead of Bluehost for web hosting support.

Control Panel and Demo

Arvixe uses the WHM cPanel that is pretty standard for nearly every hosting companies. The demo of the control panel is easy to navigate and allows you to access various files, webmail applications, myPHP admin, traffic statistics and more. One-click install applications like WordPress seem to be lacking, and are likely hidden underneath a section within the cPanel.

Bluehost offers what is called the “cPanel test drive” where prospective customers can interact with the control panel and gain access to basic instructions for utilization purposes. The Bluehost cPanel is attractive, easy-to-use, and all One-Click install applications are located on the front page.

 Arvixe cPanel:  Try Demo

Bluehost cPanel: Try Demo

★ WinnerBluehost wins the control panel test. The company has focused on making the cPanel attractive and user friendly, even for those who have never built a website before.

Visit Arvixe Visit BlueHost

Credibility

Both companies are well known for providing exceptional web hosting services. The level of credibility is often a good indicator of your future experience with a particular hosting company, because user feedback is the driving force behind credibility issues.

Bluehost has been around longer than Arvixe however, that does not mean it is any more or less credible as a hosting company. When analyzed separately, Bluehost is currently experiencing issues with customers purchasing web hosting packages without knowing that they had to pay for the entire term of the package upfront. Bluehost only offers one price for each level but never mentions that customers need to purchase the entire year until they reach the payment page, and while the company clearly states that their contracts are month-to-month, customers have complained that paying for the entire term upfront feels like an extended contract anyway.

Arvixe has not been immune to credibility issues either. The company faced upset customers that experienced downtimes in October of 2015 and extended customer support wait times. Since then, the company has rebounded with a larger team of support specialists and updated servers that can support larger customer bases. Arvixe has also improved their redundant server systems to maximize guaranteed uptime  for its customers.

★ Winner Arvixe has consistently been able to prove their credibility, especially when it comes to solving major issues and responding to specific customer requests. According to website developers and business owners, Bluehost continues to deceive customers by not properly stating their pricing rules before someone enters their credit card information.

Arvixe Vs Bluehost: Which Hosting Company is Right for You?

While both Arvixe and Bluehost are widely popular, our recommendation is to go with Arvixe. As one of the “Fastest Growing Companies in America” according to Inc. 500, Arvixe has handled this growth spirt brilliantly by upgrading their servers, expanding their datacenter and increasing their customer support staff.

Whether you’re new to the website building world or have dozens of websites under your belt, Arvixe will be able to handle any needs you have. Arvixe also offers a number of exceptional tools and applications for prospective customers, including:

  • Numerous One-Click Install applications like WordPress and Joomla.
  • Free Domain Name for Life
  • Daily Website and File Backups
  • Spam Protection Software
  • Affordable SSL Certificates

Arvixe Total Score: 5/7

Bluehost Total Score: 2/7

Arvixe is the clear winner in this Arvixe vs Bluehost battle.

Also Read: Bluehost Vs SiteGround

Visit Arvixe Visit BlueHost