Does choosing a hosting company give you nightmares?
Are you having trouble choosing between SiteGround and Bluehost because you haven’t found any unbiased reviews that you can actually understand?
Choosing the right hosting service is a nerve-wracking experience because hosting can make or break your website. You have to spend hours upon hours doing research, trying to understand what sounds like gibberish and then comparing all these companies. And biased reviews more intent on selling you something than being honest don’t make things much easier.
It’s not something you can avoid, though, because poor hosting can have your traffic dwindling to nothing – that’s if you manage to get any traffic in the first place. So, you have to put in the effort or watch your website crash and burn.
You have another option that will require less time and won’t be nearly as aggravating. I’ve done all the legwork for you and you’ll find a comprehensive SiteGround vs Bluehost hosting comparison below, along with many other hosting reviews and comparisons, including HostGator vs Bluehost and HostGator vs SiteGround.
Bluehost was founded in 2003, whereas SiteGround made its entry into hosting in 2004.
SiteGround Vs Bluehost tests
BlueHost Vs SiteGround – SecurityTest
BlueHost Vs SiteGround – Uptime Test
SiteGround vs Bluehost Server Response Time
Bluehost vs SiteGround – Website Speed Test
SiteGround Vs Bluehost: Customer Support
If you are too busy to read this entire review, here's an infographic that covers the main points.
Bluehost vs SiteGround – Performance, Reliability, Speed test and Security
While SiteGround web hosting developed some highly innovative approaches and ideas such as their own SuperCacher, free CDN by Cloudfare, NGINX web server technology and SSD Drives(Bluehost uses HDD drives) to beat the competition and provide maximum performance to its users, Bluehost has flagged behind everything for the last 2-3 years.
SSD drives are more expensive, but haven proven to be faster and more reliable than HDD drives. Only a few hosting companies can boast that their servers use SSD drives and SiteGround is one of them.
SiteGround has already released PHP 7.2 RC, thereby fulfilling their promise to offer their customers the latest technology in a timely fashion. The new release will bring a number of improvements to speed, efficiency and security.
A few other new features SiteGround has recently introduced include:
The SiteGround Migrator plugin that helps customers migrate their WordPress site quickly and easily
Conversely, Bluehost has not yet provided their customers with access to PHP 7.2 and are still running PHP 7.0. They’re also much slower across the board in terms of updates and new features, which sets them pretty far behind SiteGround on the cutting-edge technology front.
The new bot prevention system has delivered amazing results as it blocks as many as 2 million attacks across their servers. Not only does the AI system protect customer websites, but it also frees up server resources that can now be used by customers.
The AI system monitors all SiteGround’s servers simultaneously and analyzes the data. Based on the results, it takes automatic action to stop malicious bots. Some of the flags the AI watches include:
How many simultaneous connects are present to different URLs
DDoS weaknesses that are already known in different apps
A constantly updating list of blacklisted user agents
When the AI determines that an IP is malicious, it blocks it and issues a challenge via a Captcha page. If the “puzzle” is solved, meaning that it’s actually a human and not a malicious bot, the address is whitelisted. And the AI learns from these situations so that it can reduce the level of false positives that occur.
Thus, SiteGround’s new security system is much more efficient at protecting customer websites.
Bluehost relies on Cloudflare to protect its customers from DDoS attacks. They also offer other security features, such as spam protection, password-protected directories, and an option to blacklist certain IPs.
Winner: SiteGround wins by a long-shot because they’ve developed their own AI to thwart brute-force attacks and aren’t relying on a third party to protect their customers.
BlueHost Vs SiteGround – Uptime Test
Both Bluehost and SiteGround offer 99.99% uptime guarantees.However, practice shows that Bluehost has significant and consistent issues with downtime, leading to an average uptime of less than 98% per month.
I haven’t seen anything that shows a major downtime for SiteGround. Moreover, they were up more than 99.99% during the last year. They have pretty much the most in the entire web hosting industry.
SiteGround, on the other hand, does not exhibit any major problems with downtime. In fact, over the past year, their average uptime exceeded 99.99%. This proves that their servers are highly reliable and some of the best in the industry.
We used Host Tracker to monitor approximately 150 Bluehost and SiteGround websites to determine a more accurate figure for their uptime.
To see different estimates for uptime percentage, you can change the variables inthe following interactive graph Continue reading →
If you don’t know whether to choose SiteGround or FastComet because you contrast the reviews you found and aren’t even sure what to compare them on, then you’ve come to the right place.
A lot of factors go into choosing a web hosting company, and considering the consequences of choosing a poor host, it’s no wonder that many people find the experience less than pleasant.
After all, if you choose the wrong host, you could end up with a website that is nothing more than a fancy digital paperweight. Your traffic will dwindle, and your business will suffer for it.
The good news is that I’m going to fix all that for you. The following is a comprehensive review of SiteGround vs FastComet that uses plain English and analyzes the most important factors.
You can also be sure that this review is completely impartial and objective. I’m not trying to get you to buy anything. I’m only interested in making sure that you work with the best host for your needs. So, I’ve tested both hosting companies and you can find the results below.
SiteGround was founded in 2004, whereas FastComet was founded in 2010 but only expanded into web hosting in 2013.
SiteGround vs FastComet: Performance, Reliability and Speed Test
Siteground has taken a highly innovative approach to web hosting, and over the years has been at the forefront of offering top-quality services and hardware.
Thus, they have their ownSuperCacher, they offer free CDN by Cloudfare, they use SSD drives, and NGINX web server tech, all in an effort to ensure that their customers are provided with outstanding performance. It should be noted that FastComet has similar options, including SSD-only servers.
Not many companies offer SSD-only servers due to the higher costs of these drives. However, they are certainly more reliable and faster than HDDs, which is why your best option is to go with a company that relies on SSDs.
SiteGround vs FastComet: Uptime Test
Like most web hosting companies, SiteGround and FastComet both offer a guaranteed 99.99% uptime. However, you can’t always rely on guarantees, which is why we went ahead and tested both companies.
SiteGround’s uptime was on par with their guarantee, meaning that they achieved an uptime of 99.99% over the past year. As far as we’ve seen, they have some of the most reliable servers in the industry and rarely disappoint.
By comparison, FastComet achieved an uptime of 99.98% with only three outages. While this indicates FastComet’s servers are quite reliable, SiteGround still offers slightly better performance.
If you want to get a better idea of how well the two companies performed, you can enter different data points into the following graph to see the uptime of FastComet vs SiteGround in different situations.
SiteGround vs FastComet: Server Response Time
We test server response time because it will provide us with an indication of how good the servers are, but also to see how quickly your website will load. The latter is an essential metric in choosing a good host.
The test was conducted using identical websites to ensure it was fair. Thus, the sites featured WordPress installations and used the same themes, the same number of images, as well as identical page sizes, content, and requests. All plugins and caching systems were disabled.
In the graphs below, the blue line represents the number of individual users, while the green line represents server response time.
SiteGround definitely impressed us with their average response time of 515 ms, which was relatively stable all the way up to 99 concurrent users.
On the other hand, FastComet’s results were less than impressive. Up to about 25 concurrent users, their servers had an impressive response time of 471 ms.
Subsequently, though, the response time slowed down until it got to 36 seconds, and that was at only 40 concurrent users. We didn’t bother throwing more users at them because we were worried we’d end up waiting the whole day for a page to load.
Clearly, in terms of server response time, SiteGround wins hands down. FastComet clearly needs to have a good look at their servers because something is very wrong. A response time of over 30 seconds for a measly 40 concurrent users is unacceptable in today’s competitive environment.
SiteGround offers a number of plans for every budget. Whether you’re looking to host a single, small website or require space for a larger website with heavy traffic, SiteGround has a plan for you.
The StartUp plan available at $3.95, for example, is designed for a basic website or average-sized blog with less than 10,000 unique visits per month. It includes a free website builder, 24/7 technical support, SSD storage, a free CMS install, free auto daily backups, unlimited emails accounts, free Cloudflare CDN and more.
The GrowBig plan, available at $6.45 per month allows you to host unlimited websites. It’s designed to provide the best performance for either a single website with slightly heavier traffic or multiple sites with average levels of traffic.
The GoGeek plan features separate instances so that customers can share fewer resources on the same server, ensuring better performance. It’s a plan that’s designed for larger websites or average-sized ecommerce sites.
FastComet’s plans appear to be slightly cheaper than SiteGround’s offer but, like the latter, they also offer a range of plans that meet any needs.
The StartSmart plan is the smallest of the bunch and comes with a free domain for life, 15GB of SSD space and unmetered traffic. You can only host one website. Other services and features seem to be on par with SiteGround, except that it’s $2.95 per month.
ScaleRight allows for multiple websites and features 25GB of SSD space, while also including all the features of the StartSmart plan. It also comes with 3 free website transfers, a free private DNS, 1-Click Restore Manager, double the CPU and RAM, unlimited addon domains and more. This is all available at $5.95.
The SpeedUp plan offers 35GB of SSD space plus all the features provided by the other plans. It also comes with 3 times the CPU power and RAM, 3 times fewer clients per server, APC and Opcode cache and much more. This plan is available at $9.95 per month.
For more details on the plans on offer from FastComet and SiteGround, please see the table below:
Quality customer support is vital so we took the time to test both companies. Thus, the results of our FastComet vs SiteGround customer support test are as follows:
SiteGround clearly cares about their customers because they offer a number of ways for you to get the support that you need.
Thus, they offer a 24/7/365-day live chat, the ticking things system, as well as a toll number.
The wait time for their live chat is less than 5 seconds, whereas you can expect a response within 10 minutes on the ticketing system. As a reference point, I’ve waited as long as 5 minutes on other live chat systems.
They also have a feature that allows you to see the bio of every support rep, which includes user ratings, work experience, and skill set.
FastComet also boasts 24/7 support but they only offer live chat and a ticketing system. Their live chat system is effective and their representatives are knowledgeable and eager to help. It only took three minutes for them to solve a problem for me.
The ticketing system also delivered excellent results as it took them only 9 minutes to answer my question. For a ticketing system, that is quite impressive.
Based on customer support, FastComet wins in terms of response time, but only by a slight margin. However, it’s worth remembering that SiteGround offers a toll number, which FastComet does not, and they also provide some unique features, which means that in terms of quality, SiteGround wins hands down.
Both SiteGround and FastComet offer cPanel, but FastComet also includes Softaculous. As cPanel is the most popular user interface around – and the easiest to use – it’s a great option for newbies and veterans alike.
Based on their Tweets, SiteGround users are extremely happy with the company. Not only are they more than pleased with the quality of the service, but people are extremely ecstatic with the customer support team. Users repeatedly call the service fantastic and state that their support is unparalleled.
Of course, there are some displeased customers, but that tends to be the exception rather than the rule. After all, no service can be absolutely perfect and it certainly can’t make everyone happy.
For more opinions, check out the live tweets below:
FastComet also seems to have quite a few positive user reviews, especially in terms of the service they offer. However, there were some disgruntled users in terms of the effectiveness of their customer support.
For more user opinions, please check out the twitter feed below:
FastComet vs SiteGround: Free Website Migration
Both companies offer free website migration, but it’s not enough to offer it as a service. They also have to know what they’re doing. And if it takes them a month to get around to it, it’s pretty much a waste of time.
I tested SiteGround’s migration service. Their team was able to transfer my website with absolutely no issues within 24 hours, despite the fact that it was a weekend. That is truly impressive service.
Well, we thought so until I initiated a transfer request with FastComet. They did it in approximately 45 minutes, despite the fact that I initiated the request at 11 PM on a Friday night. And it only took them two minutes to reply to my request, which is even more impressive.
In this situation, FastComet wins hands down because the speed of migration was ridiculously fast.
We all know that some companies practice higher renewal charges, which can often come as a surprise. Unfortuantely, SiteGround is in the habit of charging a higher rate when you renew your plan with them.
Conversely, FastComet’s prices remain unchanged, so you won’t be paying extra when you renew.
In terms of support, uptime, and the interface on offer, FastComet and SiteGround are on equal footing. However, SiteGround offers better speed and reliability, whereas FastComet’s renewal price and site migration service is better.
Overall, though, SiteGround is a better choicesimply because we cannot stress enough the importance of speed and reliability. After all, you could put up with a lot of things, but the one thing you should never put up with is less than stellar reliability and speed because, otherwise, your traffic will suffer, which means your business will suffer too.
Nowadays, choosing a good web hosting company for their websites has become quite a challenge for webmasters. A poor choice will hurt your website and company reputation.
Since I use HostGator to host my website and iPage for my client’s websites, I have a clear view of all the pros and cons of these web hosting companies. This HostGator vs. iPage review will compare hosting on both HostGator and iPage, and help you choose the best web hosting company for your business.
Going with the first company you see isn’t always a wise choice, which is why you should research a variety of web hosting companies to see which one can provide you with better service for what you want and need for your specific website.
This HostGator vs GoDaddy review will assist you in selecting between these two web hosting companies so that you choose the best one for your needs.
After using both the HostGator and the GoDaddy for a few months, we compared the two web hosting across eight categories on a 100-point scale. Based on our test, HostGator is now the one to beat in web hosting industry. Here’s why.
HostGator and GoDaddy both promise a high uptime of 99.99% each month. HostGator uses Linux x86 CentOS 6 64-bit operating systems, while its servers run on Dual Xeon E5520 2.26 GHz Quad Core processors. GoDaddy provides customers the choice of choosing between Linux and Windows OS before signing up. And their servers run on Intel Core i7 processors.
Recently, there have been many outages regarding the uptime of GoDaddy, which has caused many customers to become outraged and drop their service. I personally feel that they are still an excellent domain registrar, but don’t provide great quality when it comes to web hosting services.
My team kept track of uptimes for both HostGator and GoDaddy for the last seven months using real time uptime tracking powered by Host-tracker
The result was a 99.99% uptime for HostGator and a below average uptime of <98% for GoDaddy.
Uptime of Sites Hosted on HostGator
Uptime of Sites Hosted on GoDaddy
To have a more precise understanding of HostGator’s uptime, we started tracking uptime of our personal blog hosted under HostGator.
Here are the results…
HostGator performed exceptionally well, and scored an uptime of 99.99% or greater throughout the entire period of our testing.
HostGator Uptime Report (March – April 2015)
HostGator Uptime Report(January-February 2015)
HostGator Uptime Report (May- June 2014)
Winner: HostGator – Both of my uptime tests show that HostGator scores consistent uptime of 99.99% throughout our testing period of one year.
HostGator Vs GoDaddy – Server Response time(15 Points)
We tested load time and server response time of websites hosted on HostGator and GoDaddy using Load Impact App.
The Green Line indicates the number of visitors and blue line represent the adjacent response time as the traffic increase. The traffic was steadily increased from 1 to 50 visitors and the response time was noted.
Response time of sites hosted on HostGator
Maximum Response Time: 3.2 seconds Min Response Time: 258.07 milliseconds (The least for any web hosting tested at Inline Hosting review)
HostGator’s server performance seems to be solid, healthy and consistent. Only problem is that we don’t want to see a graph with lots of ups and down, flat lines are great for a hosting company. HostGator returned the fastest response time compared to any other hosting.
Response time of sites hosted on GoDaddy Max Response Time: 4.1 minutes Minimum Response Time: 483.08 milliseconds
GoDaddy started at an excellent server response time of 480ms, but once the traffic passed 25, it started slowing down heavily. The server become completely unresponsive and the rejection list was very high. Moreover, the final result has high number of failed attempt. GoDaddy fared well for lower traffic and completely fell apart once the traffic hit 26 mark.
Winner: HostGator – HostGator website loaded with an average response time of 600 ms with a maximum of 3 second compared to GoDaddy which have an average over 1500ms and a maximum of 4.1 minute.
HostGator vs Bluehost – Website Speed test(15 Points)
We performed a test to determine the speed of a website running with HostGator and GoDaddy.
For a better understanding, I have selected couple of website Hosted under HostGator and GoDaddy for testing their speed.
Note:-Bothweb pages are exactly same, i.e. they have same page size, design, request and images.
Website hosted under HostGator loaded at 603ms compared to GoDaddy which took 1.4 S to load.
Speed of Sites hosted on HostGator
Load time: 603ms ; Medium: Pingdom
Speed of Sites hosted on GoDaddy
Load time: 1.4 S ; Medium: Pingdom
Winner: HostGator –Its very clear from these tests that HostGator servers are very fast and reliable.
Prices, Plans, and Features( 5 Points)
HostGator and GoDaddy are very much alike when it comes to their plans and prices. HostGator has three plans: Hatchling, Baby and Business.
GoDaddy features similar plans to HostGator, naming them: Economy, Deluxe and Unlimited. The Economy plan features a single domain and 100GB disk space; the other two plans come with unlimited disk space and domains.
The graph below shows the prices, and features of both company’s plans:
As webmasters, choosing a highly reliable web hosting company that fits into all our requirements has been the most difficult task. There are so many web hosting companies on the market that finding the right one can sometimes be overwhelming.
I have already compared Bluehost Vs HostGator and HostGator vs SiteGround in another post, but this specific post adds in DreamHost and compares it to the previous two. HostGator and Bluehost are two of the most highly-rated web hosting companies on the web and are often featured in top review posts across the Internet.
All three are great choices to go with, but each one provides something different from the other, and this review of HostGator vs Bluehost vs DreamHost will help make your selection process much easier.
In this post, I’ll compare performance (which includes uptime and speed), pricing plans and features, customer support, and control panels.