If you’re having trouble choosing between Bluehost and FastComet because you’re not exactly sure what factors should influence your decision, then this Bluehost vs FastComet comparison will make things a lot easier on you.
Choosing the right web hosting company is essential because a host can make or break your website. If your site is down all the time or takes a really long time to load because your hosts servers offer poor performance, you’ll find that you lose more and more traffic until it stops completely.
In this BlueHost versus FastComet review, I’ll be analyzing the most important factors involved in choosing a host and comparing the two companies. I’ve also made sure to use plain English and to provide explanations where I couldn’t so that you can make a completely informed decision.
All the information presented in this comparison is the result of tests my team and I have conducted, which means that it’s accurate and not sourced from a third party.
Furthermore, you can be sure that this review is impartial and objective, because my only goal is to make sure that you find a web hosting company that suits your needs.
After you read the review, if you’re not certain which host you choose, make sure to check out some of my other hosting comparisons and reviews, such as SiteGround Vs FastComet, HostGator vs SiteGround, and SiteGround vs Bluehost.
Bluehost was founded in 2003, whereas FastComet was founded in 2010 but they only started offering hosting in 2013.
Fastcomet Vs Bluehost tests
Here’s the end result of this entire comparison on which hosting is better among Fastcomet and Bluehost.
- Popularity Test – Bluehost
- Security Test – Fastcomet and Bluehost
- Uptime Test – Bluehost
- Website Speed Test – Fastcomet
- Backup – Fastcomet
- Pricing – Fastcomet
- Customer Support – Fastcomet
- UA Interface – Fastcomet and Bluehost
Is Fastcomet better than Bluehost?
Yes, as Fastcomet wins: 6/8 tests.
Whereas, Bluehost only wins: 4/8 test.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Performance
Though Bluehost isn’t the fastest in terms of providing their customers with innovative hosting solutions and outstanding performance, they do try their best. This is evidenced by the fact that their servers are equipped with SSD’s, they offer CPU throttling, a free CDN from Cloudflare, and free SSL certificates.
The importance of a content distribution network, or CDN, cannot be discounted because it significantly improves the load time of your website by reducing the physical distance between your site and the visitor’s computer. When you’re using a CDN, it makes a copy of your website and stores it across multiple servers all over the world.
Bluehost servers support PHP 7.0, as well as the older PHP 5.4 and 5.6. The company is also started offering PHP 7.2, but this is only for those accounts that are using the new account management interface dubbed Bluerock.
FastComet does a much better job in terms of performance. Like Bluehost, all their servers are equipped with SSD’s, they offer free Cloudeflare CDN, and free SSL certificates. However, they also offer HTTP/2 – a significant improvement over the standard HTTP – and HSTS.
First of all, SSL certificates are mandatory because they encrypt any sensitive information that visitors provide you with, from their email addresses, usernames and passwords to their addresses and credit card information. So, while in SSL certificate doesn’t necessarily improve performance, it will improve credibility and trust.
The HSTS that FastComet offers is a browser security feature that will let you force the visitor’s browser to only communicate via encrypted channels. This ensures that unencrypted communications are not possible, which not only adds an additional layer of protection for your visitors, but also helps to mitigate attacks on your website.
Bluehost versus FastComet: Speed Test
Speed is a vital factor when it comes to choosing the right web host, which is why we never rely on what the hosting company says and instead conduct our own tests.
Thus, we hosted two identical websites with each of these providers and then conducted a load impact test. The latter involves sending more and more concurrent visitors to the website to see how quickly the server responds.
In the charts below, the green line represents the number of concurrent users, the blue line represents the load time, while the purple line represents the number of requests made per second.
As you can see from the charts, FastComet had a response time twice as good as Bluehost.
Thus, at 50 concurrent users, Bluehost had a response time of 89 ms, and at 100 users, it was 79 ms.
FastComet, on the other hand, had a response time of 43 ms at 52 concurrent users, and 45 ms at 100 concurrent users.
So, if we had to choose solely based on speed, we would definitely pick FastComet.★ Winner Fastcomet.
Bluehost Vs FastComet: Uptime
Uptime is an essential factor to consider when choosing a Web hosting company because it represents the amount of time that your site is online and available to people who want to visit it. If it’s unavailable for too long, or if its availability drops out frequently, your site will invariably fail as people get frustrated.
The problem is that there’s not a lot you can do about uptime because it’s all in the hands of your web hosting company. The only thing you can do is to choose a web host that has a proven track record in terms of uptime.
Bluehost and FastComet both state that users have a guaranteed uptime of 99.99%. Marketing messages aren’t always in line with reality, though, which is why we tested both companies.
According to our live uptime tracking tool, over a period of three months, Bluehost generated an uptime of 100%, with no downtimes.
By comparison, FastComet had an uptime of 99.98%, with 10 outages.
Thus, based on uptime, we would have to go with Bluehost for their better uptime.★ Winner Bluehost.
Bluehost Vs FastComet: Security
In terms of security, both companies aren’t all that impressive. They both offer a few basic features, like spam protection, the ability to blacklist IPAs, password protected directories, and so on.
Likewise, both companies rely on 1/3 party for more extensive security features, namely Cloudflare. Cloudflare is one of the best companies on the market in terms of website security, and their protection against DDoS attacks is unparalleled.
So, we don’t have a problem at all with the company Bluehost and FastComet choose to use for security. What we do have a problem with is that two big companies like FastComet and Bluehost should be offering far more to their clients in terms of security. They should be doing much more themselves instead of relying so much on a third party.★ Winner Tie.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Support
When it comes to something as technical as website hosting, if something goes wrong, you need to be able to get in touch quickly with the customer support team. Plus, they need to be knowledgeable enough to actually help sort out your problem, or to provide you with the guidance you need.
So, we went ahead and tested both FastComet and Bluehost to see how effective their support team is.
Bluehost provides customers with highly detailed video tutorials on the website, along with a forum. They also have a live chat feature, getting through to an agent took less than a minute, which was quite impressive.
The problem, though, is that their team doesn’t seem to be quite that efficient and knowledgeable. Many customers have experienced problems repeatedly that they thought they’d managed to resolve with the customer support team’s help, only to find the same problems creeping up again.
FastComet offers 24/7 support via live chat and a ticketing system. They respond quickly via live chat, and the live agents I’ve spoken to are knowledgeable, experienced, and extremely eager to help. It took them only three minutes to solve an issue I had.
The ticketing system was surprisingly fast, as it only took nine minutes for me to get an answer to my question, which is extremely impressive for this type of system.★ Winner Fastcomet. We have to choose FastComet because of their fast response times and highly knowledgeable team.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Prices, Plans and Features
Both companies have quite a few shared hosting plans available, ranging from very cheap to quite expensive.
|Bluehost Basic||Basic Choice Plus|
|Disk Space||15 GB||35GB||50 GB||Unlimited|
|Free Domain||Yes ( For life)||Yes ( For life)||Yes||Yes|
|Control Panel||cPanel or Plesk||cPanel or Plesk||cPanel||cPanel|
|For 1 Month||$25.90||$32.90||Not Available||Not Available|
|12 month Plan||$4.95||$11.95/mo||$4.95/mo. (Click on signup for this price)||$7.45/mo|
|2 Year Term||$3.95||$10.95||$3.95/mo||$6.45/mo|
|3 Year Term||$2.95||$9.95||$2.95/mo||$5.45/mo|
|Sign Up Now!||Sign Up Now!||Sign Up Now!||Sign Up Now!|
Thus, Bluehost’s cheapest plan starts at $2.95 per month and includes things like one free domain registration when signing up for year, the free SSL certificate, one free backup of your website per week, and unmetered bandwidth.
FastComet’s cheapest plan is the same price as Bluehost, at $.295, for which you can get 15GB of SSD space, unmetered traffic, and a free domain for life.
In terms of plans, we have to go with FastComet because the renewal price they charge is the same as the initial price, whereas Bluehost charges almost double when you renew.★ Winner Fastcomet.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Control Panel
Both companies use cPanel, which is not surprising since it is the most popular control panel available. FastComet does offer a few additional features, but nothing to write home about.★ Winner Tie.
Bluehost Vs FastComet: Backup Features
Unfortunately, Bluehost is rather stingy when it comes to backup features. They use an external tool called code guard to backup and restore your website. This would necessarily be a problem, if they didn’t charge you an additional $8 per month to use the service.
FastComet on the other hand includes a backup and restore feature as part of their normal shared hosting plans. You can quickly and easily backup your website straight from the control panel.
Furthermore, FastComet has implemented a seven independent snapshot policy, which means that they keep seven separate copies of your account in a completely secure and remote location.
To restore your website, however, you will have to submit a support ticket. The team usually takes only about 10 minutes to respond to a ticket, which means is not that big of a problem. Plus, many customers will appreciate the fact that they don’t have to restore the website themselves.★ Winner Fastcomet. In terms of backup features, we definitely have to vote for FastComet because they are incredibly professional and very fast. Plus, they don’t charge extra.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Popularity
Bluehost claimed that they had a total of 1,248,507 on their servers as of November 2018.
Unfortunately, there isn’t a lot of information on FastComet in terms of number of sites hosted. However, considering that they are relatively new by comparison to Bluehost, it’s understandable that the latter is more popular.
According to Google trends, Bluehost is way popular than Fastcomet.
However, due to their great services and their professionalism, they are growing quickly.★ Winner Bluehost.
Bluehost vs FastComet: Final Verdict
Bluehost and FastComet are two of the best hosting companies on the market. Bluehost has been offering their services for a long time, so they’re definitely experienced, and they have a great reputation.
FastComet might be new on the market, but they do offer quite a number of innovative features, and they are doing everything in their power to prove that they deserve to be among the top hosting providers. This is clearly evidenced by their superior speed and much better customer support.
Unfortunately, ever since the Endurance International Group purchased Bluehost, the quality of their services has declined, which is clear from all the negative reviews they’ve received.
Endurance International Group is a large conglomerate that has been buying up a lot of web hosting providers and now have over 70 brands under their umbrella. The problem is that they have a reputation for taking a web host over and then pretty much ruining the services they offer with personnel cuts and more.
Thus, due to the decline in the quality of services Bluehost offers, and the fact that FastComet has lots of new innovative features, I have to recommend FastComet as the best option.Visit Fastcomet Visit BlueHost