Webhostingpad Rating3.5Speed4Uptime4Security4Price4Interface3.5SupportReviewer 3.8 / 5Users (0 votes) {{ reviewsOverall }} / 5$3.99Price...
Page speed is both a ranking factor in search engines and an important factor in increasing conversions. In addition, in a world where everything happens on the screen of a mobile phone, your site or app must load at lig...
Updated: June 6, 2020
Choosing the right hosting service is a nerve-wracking experience because hosting can make or break your website. You have to spend hours upon hours doing research, trying to understand what sounds like gibberish and then comparing all these companies. In this SiteGround Vs Bluehost comparison, we will find out which brand is performing best at this level.
SiteGround and Bluehost are a great choice for beginners and popular blogs alike. They are both leaders in their categories, but they are also extremely popular, with around 2 million customers each.
You can also check out many other hosting reviews and comparisons in this blog, including HostGator vs Bluehost and SiteGround Vs HostGator.
About our SiteGround Vs Bluehost comparison: We tested SiteGround and Bluehost by purchasing their hosting on their servers in Chicago and Provo respectively. It ran WordPress 5.2.3 and used a heavy theme with demo content from Mojo marketplace. And both hostings were primarily tested from Los Angeles, USA.
To clarify, we receive affiliate payment for all the product that you purchase through our link, which in turn helps us finance our work. We get compensation no matter which hosting we promote, so monetary compensation doesn’t have any effect on our rankings.
Kinsta Ratings5Speed5Uptime4.5Security3.5Price4Interface4SupportReviewer 4.3 / 5Users (10 votes) {{ reviewsOverall }} / 530$/moPrice...
SiteGround Ratings4.5Speed5Uptime5Security4.5Price5Interface5SupportReviewer 4.8 / 5Users (0 votes) {{ reviewsOverall }} / 5$5.65/moPrice ...